Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:16 pm  

jools wrote:

Or we could promote one of our promising youngsters....

We could I agree

Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:01 pm  

GiantJake1988 wrote:

Buy the sounds of things mate we have 2 Aussies still to come in. Wakeman - once he gets his Italian passport and a NSW cup centre. I think Gaskell will start at FB until Mamo is fit but then he will be first choice cover for halves and full back.

If these come to fruition as well as been able to get another hooker in.... either Dwyer on season long loan or Adam O Brien (depending on what happens to the bulls) we look to have a very strong squad even in depth.

If we don't get another hooker in and Leeming gets injured we may see a Gaskell/Brierley partnership in the halves with Broughy in at hooker.

hope we get wakeman

not heard about this centre? but it would solve that scenario we have for who plays centre!

would like dwyer or obrien too at hooker both good players

gaskell or brierley could play full back till mamo is fit

in stoney we trust!

Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:34 pm  

I'll give it 4 games until he starts getting slagged off and the send him back, waste of space/money/cap etc stuff starts if he isn't scoring 5 tries every game.

Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Tue Dec 20, 2016 8:42 pm  

jools wrote:

Or we could promote one of our promising youngsters....

People have been complaining about lack of numbers, however good or not he turns out to be he's an extra body.

Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Tue Dec 20, 2016 8:49 pm  

meast wrote:

I'll give it 4 games until he starts getting slagged off and the send him back, waste of space/money/cap etc stuff starts if he isn't scoring 5 tries every game.

Why that long ? Rick Stone got 2, Ukuma and Mick De Vere got 1 i think.

Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Tue Dec 20, 2016 8:59 pm  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

People have been complaining about lack of numbers, however good or not he turns out to be he's an extra body.

I was commenting in reply to someone who suggested if we didn't sign a hooker broughy could play 9.

Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:03 pm  

Ah, sorry presumed it was in relation to us signing Jake.

Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:44 am  

gaskell or brierley could play full back till mamo is fit

in stoney we trust![/quote]

Indeed and hopefully he doesnt b--gar about with that idea once again

leave him with Broughy IN THE HALVES for goodness sake !

Broughy to hooker and brearley to full back? Thats a gbreat idea -Mess about with the engine!!
Dont know what goeson at times......................

Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Wed Dec 21, 2016 12:51 am  

GIANT DAZ wrote:

People have been complaining about lack of numbers, however good or not he turns out to be he's an extra body.

Agreed that we shouldn't be judging him before he has a fair trial, but with Wardle going the other way we are in a net zero position

Re: Jake Mamo confirmed : Wed Dec 21, 2016 8:19 am  

Aren't we still in minus?