Re: Homeless in 2015 : Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:49 am  

Perry wrote:

Yeah we talked about rugby and nobody received personal insults. Terrible, that.

Nope.....the main topic was one that traditionally appears in the off season........oh, hang on, it was most assuredly an off season. The activity on the forum actually went down.

Re: Homeless in 2015 : Fri Oct 10, 2014 9:59 am  

gutterfax wrote:

...The activity on the forum actually went down.

Who cares? It's the quality that matters not the quantity.
Take yourself as an example. You're the most prolific poster on here, quantity is definitely not an issue. But every post is the same old self-promoting drivel, a lack of quality.

Re: Homeless in 2015 : Fri Oct 10, 2014 10:54 am  

Perry wrote:

Who cares? It's the quality that matters not the quantity.
Take yourself as an example. You're the most prolific poster on here, quantity is definitely not an issue. But every post is the same old self-promoting drivel, a lack of quality.

How is calling the clubs owner an idiot the move to the hive unnecessary and the teams chances of survival part next year as minimal SELFPROMOTING?

For someone who claims i make personal attacks, you seem pretty infatuated with me and my opinions......generally accusing me and being well wide of the mark. As for the quality of my posts.......90% ofmy posts are accurate. Because they arent all happyhappy bollox is irrelevant

Re: Homeless in 2015 : Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:01 pm  

Great we are back to % s and swearing well done mate
as for 90% you started this one and proved to be 100% inaccurate.

back to the other discussion, move to Gillingham would probably have been a step too far for the few that are left, so MK would likely get the same response. I for one are of the mind London broncos/quins/Fulham whatever should be London based, how you class Londonthen becomes the question, again my view keep it inside the m 25, being in our own stadium would be prefer ed but we have been trying for 30 plus years, I suspect it's still a way off if unachievable, how many clubs actually do?

Re: Homeless in 2015 : Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:18 pm  

mickyb1234 wrote:

Great we are back to % s and swearing well done mate
as for 90% you started this one and proved to be 100% inaccurate.

back to the other discussion, move to Gillingham would probably have been a step too far for the few that are left, so MK would likely get the same response. I for one are of the mind London broncos/quins/Fulham whatever should be London based, how you class Londonthen becomes the question, again my view keep it inside the m 25, being in our own stadium would be prefer ed but we have been trying for 30 plus years, I suspect it's still a way off if unachievable, how many clubs actually do?

100% inaccurate? Really?

Re: Homeless in 2015 : Fri Oct 10, 2014 2:19 pm  

mickyb1234 wrote:

back to the other discussion, move to Gillingham would probably have been a step too far for the few that are left, so MK would likely get the same response. I for one are of the mind London broncos/quins/Fulham whatever should be London based, how you class Londonthen becomes the question, again my view keep it inside the m 25, being in our own stadium would be prefer ed but we have been trying for 30 plus years, I suspect it's still a way off if unachievable, how many clubs actually do?

While Gillingham would have been a lot easier for me to get to than the Stoop ( and now the Hive) I was against the move for the reason you say. Move to MK and I would have said forget it, or at best become a very occasional / armchair supporter. Its difficult to see us as being anything other than someone's tenant but I read last night that AFC Wimbledon are bidding to return to their home patch by moving to a site on or by the old greyhound track. I suppose if they can pull it off with their limited fanbase then maybe there's a little hope for us?

Re: Homeless in 2015 : Fri Oct 10, 2014 4:25 pm  

Are we still based at the hive? The only suggestions that we are not goingto be at the hive is from 1 person with a "reliable" source so using that person own words ish it's blox with no substance.
So yep 100%

Re: Homeless in 2015 : Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:00 pm  

mickyb1234 wrote:

Are we still based at the hive? The only suggestions that we are not goingto be at the hive is from 1 person with a "reliable" source so using that person own words ish it's blox with no substance.
So yep 100%

ah.....so its untrue that the 2nd year option is being renegotiated then? Remember now..........the topic title was a "leader"...........and we are still in print or writing not confirmed as being based at the hive. As i understand it, ak has asked for further assurances........

Re: Homeless in 2015 : Fri Oct 10, 2014 5:15 pm  

So the thread title homeless in 2015 meant what then? You started it, to Me only says one thing, that according to your source we would not be at the hive next year

Re: Homeless in 2015 : Sat Oct 11, 2014 7:26 am  

mickyb1234 wrote:

So the thread title homeless in 2015 meant what then? You started it, to Me only says one thing, that according to your source we would not be at the hive next year

then michael, you are myopic.Read what i posted.....i said tbe hjve weren't interested in the 2nd year option.....tHey weren't and as such, negotiations are in progress......Let's face it....we're not exactly spoilt for options.