BigTime wrote:
A catastrophic run of results no doubt but sacked with 3 games to go! How is that to work out any other way than badly with no replacement of even close to the necessary standard. Surely you drop the hammer sooner or not at all,
A salutary lesson that it’s not just LB management who make odd decisions. Having said that I would be surprised to hear that AFC failed to open their ticket office (metaphorically speaking) for a must win game during a relaunch season.
It's actually seven games, but your point remains valid. The problem is it's become very toxic and in 12 days time they at home to "that team". There are already issues with letting Franchise fans travel alone rather than being bussed in. A likely thumping together with a team that's totally lost their way is asking for trouble. This will be Franchise's first ever match in Wimbledon (Merton/Wandsworth boundary caveat) and if this had carried on there would be very few officials left at the club in a fortnight.
This is a "sacking" to prevent bigger issues coming to the surface. I guess with a small chance they can survive the drop.
Football wise the club is in an utter mess. Has any team in the history of sport sold out a match on the back of a 20 game winless streak. The latest PL Bond is within 100,000 of the 3.3 million target. But no CEO, no head coach/manager, owners (Dons Trust Board) in disarray. Player recruitment run by a guy from a Betting company (Football Manager is one of his tools).
I see a lot of similarities between the two clubs, lack of staff, believing players from a lower level are the solution, bad comms etc. AFC Wimbledon still have the fan base (fourth biggest crowd in England on Saturday, albeit with limited matches played) and volunteers. London Broncos appear to have broken the bridges on both of those. One club his a single owner, the other is owned and run by committee. Both seem to be failing by who the appoint in key roles.