full back : Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:09 pm  

did anyone else notice that we played 4 different people at full back, phelpsy,roberts ,paaat, and goulding, i wish richards was there when they put up the bomb that roberts let bounce for there try

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:10 pm  

Only reason why that happened was because Phelps went off injured.

Re: full back : Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:12 pm  

binxterboy wrote:

did anyone else notice that we played 4 different people at full back, phelpsy,roberts ,paaat, and goulding, i wish richards was there when they put up the bomb that roberts let bounce for there try

It was said before the season started that Roberts is a bit dodgy on defence, esp high balls and I think it proved so last night

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:12 pm  

Mini Rogue wrote:

Only reason why that happened was because Phelps went off injured.

And both Richards and Roberts picked up knocks.

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:14 pm  

they all swapped around at least twice except for goulding, they were'nt all injured, were they?

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 10:26 pm  

binxterboy wrote:

they all swapped around at least twice except for goulding, they were'nt all injured, were they?

Read my previous post.

rl : Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:58 am  

Noble said that by the end of the game we had 11 fit men.

Re: rl : Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:59 am  

Father Ted wrote:

Noble said that by the end of the game we had 11 fit men.

Lucky you, thats what we start games with!

Re: rl : Sun Feb 15, 2009 2:30 pm  

Uptoncat wrote:

Lucky you, thats what we start games with!

and yet you can still beat us

: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:42 pm  

Roberts was awful at fullback, except for one run in the second half. You looked much better with Pat Richards there. Saying that, Richards looked better when on the wing. It's just a shame for you that you don't have two Pat Richards'