Your team for Bradford : Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:55 pm  

I may get shot down here, I may not

1 Pat Richards
2 Amos Roberts
3 Phil Bailey
4 George Carmont
5 Sean Ainscough
6 Tim Smith
7 Tommy Leuluai
8 Eamon O'Carroll
9 Michael McIlorum
10 Stuart Fielden
11 Harrison Hansen
12 Joel Tomkins
13 Sean O'Loughlin

14 Gareth Hock
15 Paul Prescott
16 Feka
17 Sam Tomkins


No place for Riddell, Phelps, Daryl, Coley, Karl Pryce or Mathers. None of em deserve to play right now.

Re: Your team for Bradford : Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:56 pm  

Meyt N Prater Pie wrote:

I may get shot down here, I may not

1 Pat Richards
2 Amos Roberts
3 Phil Bailey
4 George Carmont
5 Sean Ainscough
6 Tim Smith
7 Tommy Leuluai
8 Eamon O'Carroll
9 Michael McIlorum
10 Stuart Fielden
11 Harrison Hansen
12 Joel Tomkins
13 Sean O'Loughlin

14 Gareth Hock
15 Paul Prescott
16 Feka
17 Sam Tomkins


No place for Riddell, Phelps, Daryl, Coley, Karl Pryce or Mathers. None of em deserve to play right now.

sounds good to me

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:57 pm  

Spot on imo.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:59 pm  

Seems ok to me, the only issue is riddell who i think needs more game time but it's catch 22 with him at the min.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:00 pm  

RB wrote:

Spot on imo.

I'd go with Pryce instead of Roberts. Another non-performing, expensive import. Pryce wasn't great against Cas but was far from awful.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:00 pm  

NickNJ wrote:

Seems ok to me, the only issue is riddell who i think needs more game time but it's catch 22 with him at the min.

RESERVES

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:01 pm  

Diasgree, I seem to be in the minority here but I thought Riddell went pretty well against Quins and with time he'll improve much more.

Richards
Roberts
Bailey
Carmont
Ainscough
Leuluai
Smith
Fielden
Riddell
O'Carroll
Hock
Tomkins
O'Loughlin

Feka
Hansen
Prescott
Tomkins

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:02 pm  

jinkin jimmy wrote:

I'd go with Pryce instead of Roberts. Another non-performing, expensive import.

What on earth..

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:05 pm  

I agree Pryce should not play due to fitness but saying he does not deserve to play sounds a tad harsh.

He's done nothing wrong has he?

Carried the water like a pro Saturday. When is he fit for playing, anyone know? If fit I'd shove him in at Centre for Bailey.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:07 pm  

LondonRobster wrote:

I agree Pryce should not play due to fitness but saying he does not deserve to play sounds a tad harsh.

He's done nothing wrong has he?

Carried the water like a pro Saturday. When is he fit for playing, anyone know? If fit I'd shove him in at Centre for Bailey.

Pryce played against Castleford and looked about 60% fit at the most.