We would have beaten Cas and Wakey : Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:28 pm  

Tomkins impressed me so much against Harlequins, that I'm sure he would have made the difference against Cas and Wakefield and we would be riding high in the table right now.
And it's not just hindsight...90% of posters on here would have had him in the 17 for those two games.
Had he not played against Quins we would not have won.
He may not be so crucial against Leeds and Saints but the above games were there for the taking. How frustrating!

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:30 pm  

DON'T START ME ON THIS ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:30 pm  

Those games are lost now. Don't get me wrong I rate Sam highly but he's not God, he can't tackle for everyone.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:31 pm  

TWS™ wrote:

Those games are lost now. Don't get me wrong I rate Sam highly but he's not God, he can't tackle for everyone.

Agreed but he is a stand off, something we've not had until Saturday.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:32 pm  

We would of scored more points with him in the team and the difference was only afew in both the games. I slightly agree but I dont think you can blame Noble for not throwing him first game against Wakey.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:34 pm  

TWS™ wrote:

Those games are lost now. Don't get me wrong I rate Sam highly but he's not God, he can't tackle for everyone.

should be left at that people are starting to get ideas about this kid and im worried it could have a negative effect

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:35 pm  

TWS™ wrote:

he's not God

You've summed it up there for me. People need to lower their expectations of Sam, its not fair on someone who's just made their first SL appearance.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:36 pm  

TWS™ wrote:

Those games are lost now. Don't get me wrong I rate Sam highly but he's not God, he can't tackle for everyone.

That's why he won't make that much difference against top teams but he will improve Wigan.
We lost against Wakefield because our attack needed some spark. We lost against Cas because of inept tackling on our right hand side. Sam would have made the difference. He would have tipped the balance.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:37 pm  

MadDogg wrote:

You've summed it up there for me. People need to lower their expectations of Sam, its not fair on someone who's just made their first SL appearance.

I dread the day on here when Sam has a bad game/drops a ball/misses a tackle. He's a talented kid that's for sure but people are laying too much expectation on him for me. He seems the type that can handle it though which is a good thing.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:38 pm  

odemwingie wrote:

We would of scored more points with him in the team and the difference was only afew in both the games. I slightly agree but I dont think you can blame Noble for not throwing him first game against Wakey.

Wakey had eight missing. Who else is there to blame.