wigan pie man wrote:
deffo need a proper 6, because smith cant play there.
is we play sam, where does that leave tommy? arguably the best player yesterday, and wasted at 9 imo.
as someones said, there are no quality 6's available, so how about trying out my theory (dont rubbish it till youve thought about it).
KARL PRYCE at 6.
his bro never played 6 at bradford, he played sinilar roles to karl, wing, centre, full back, but never (or maybe the odd one off) at 6.
bradford fans used to rubbish my suggestions that he was a 6....now look at him..........gb no 6.
so lets try the same switch with his bro, who is similar in style.
is we play sam, where does that leave tommy? arguably the best player yesterday, and wasted at 9 imo.
as someones said, there are no quality 6's available, so how about trying out my theory (dont rubbish it till youve thought about it).
KARL PRYCE at 6.
his bro never played 6 at bradford, he played sinilar roles to karl, wing, centre, full back, but never (or maybe the odd one off) at 6.
bradford fans used to rubbish my suggestions that he was a 6....now look at him..........gb no 6.
so lets try the same switch with his bro, who is similar in style.
Jesus.
You can't be serious, no way.