Stu M wrote:
Sore loser? I suggest you read his comments back again from yesterday. Admitted England were much the better side and maturely refused to be drawn into Wane’s obsession with him with his childish comments.
After the first game he said the ruck was slow- a comment lots of SL coaches have made at various times. He also said the pitch was poor- it was.
At no point has he accused England of anything disrespectful and yet he easily could’ve made a point of Wane’s programme notes from the first game.
To describe a coach as “done ok” after winning x3 GF’s in a row, a CC and a LLS was pathetic.
There’s only one coach looking like an idiot at the end of this series regardless of results and it’s not Woolf.
It comes to something when Wigan fans are disappointed in him.
If I remember rightly the pitch (even if it was not fit for test rugby) and the referee at Saints was the same for both sides, correct me if I am wrong. He made no comment about being outplayed and, dare I say it, outcoached.
However, I think that I have to cut him a bit of slack as it was his captain who added fuel to the fire when he said, "England did not win the opening Test, Tonga lost it". I do not recall either of them saying that England were the best side, but I am willing to be corrected.
He had to correct the record yesterday as England were clearly the best side in fact, Tonga have been very poor and one dimensional. Woolf's saints tactics have clearly had little impact. I do however agree about Waney's comments that Woolf has 'done ok' were also unwarranted.
Just to add, that I am not disappointed in Waney, he just loves to win.
.