Re: Rumours and signings v9 : Tue May 14, 2013 10:20 am
NickyKiss wrote:
Tomkins for u20's players? We have our own kids. We need a top class player/s to replace Sam and a gamble on a couple of Warriors reserves won't cut the mustard.
I really hope we don't role over and let them tickle our bellies on this one. We need top players in exchange or hard cash to buy top class players with.
Yesterday proved just what we're losing. Take Sam out of that team yesterday and we lose IMO.
I really hope we don't role over and let them tickle our bellies on this one. We need top players in exchange or hard cash to buy top class players with.
Yesterday proved just what we're losing. Take Sam out of that team yesterday and we lose IMO.
Exactly. I am resigned to losing Sam at some point and probably before the 5 year deal is up but if the club sells him before the three year clause is up I can't see how it can justify it. And certainly not if it replaces him with a young or reserve grade player.
I am sure someone will point out that the clause only meant Sam could not instigate a move in the three year period but who cares about that if our club instigates it instead?
It's bad enough losing contracted players as it is but if the club is trying to sell its best player with little hope of replacing him you have to question the ambition of those in charge.
Lets hope it's just rumours and for once the club realises its success is better served by knocking back bids and certainly by not actively seeking to sell its best player if that is what is happening.