: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:55 pm  

Woody_woody wrote:

Funny I thought Roberts scored

How many passes went out to the Hudds wingers tonight?

There seems to be 2 camps regards Noble the performance camp, which i am in and who criticise Noble and the results camp where most of the Noble supporters stand.

At the moment not sure how the results camp can have a leg to stand on, other than to hang on to the frail hope we win a few play off games and still in real terms are no closer to winning anything for another year.

: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:57 pm  

Woody_woody wrote:

Funny I thought Roberts scored

How many passes went out to the Hudds wingers tonight?

Hmm maybe you are right, not sure if Robbo was off then.

My alzheimers is giving me gip

But we should have capitalised on it more in my opinion.

: Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:58 pm  

Woody_woody wrote:

Funny I thought Roberts scored

How many passes went out to the Hudds wingers tonight?

They didn't have to get the ball to the wings because they were winning for most of the game so all they had to do was concerntrate on winning the forward battle (which they did comfortably)

: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:04 pm  

jonh wrote:

There seems to be 2 camps regards Noble the performance camp, which i am in and who criticise Noble and the results camp where most of the Noble supporters stand.

At the moment not sure how the results camp can have a leg to stand on, other than to hang on to the frail hope we win a few play off games and still in real terms are no closer to winning anything for another year.

Why you making this out to be an argument between the pro Nobby and anti Nobby brigade. I'm just calling it as I see it.

People are saying our tactics were inferior but Huddersfield used pretty much the same tactics. I'd say we were dominant for most of the game in terms of field position but a couple of bad decision making from individuals cost as try scoring opportunitites.

If Richards kicks his kicks we're 12-10 up and would probably see out the game. It was a fine margin between victory and defeat tonight. It was nowhere near like the humiliation of last year and the scoreline flatters them IMO.

: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:06 pm  

when shaun wane appeared in bar beforehand to announce team he said the boys have been working all week on playing on the outisde shoulder cos hudds are too big up the middle...

really? did the rain mean the players forgot the gameplan/weeks training or does shaun know more about rugby then nobby?

: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:09 pm  

pk wrote:

did the rain mean the players forgot the gameplan/weeks training or does shaun know more about rugby then nobby?

I'm beginning to think my Mum knows more about rugby then Nobby.

: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:10 pm  

Woody_woody wrote:

Why you making this out to be an argument between the pro Nobby and anti Nobby brigade. I'm just calling it as I see it.

People are saying our tactics were inferior but Huddersfield used pretty much the same tactics. I'd say we were dominant for most of the game in terms of field position but a couple of bad decision making from individuals cost as try scoring opportunitites.

If Richards kicks his kicks we're 12-10 up and would probably see out the game. It was a fine margin between victory and defeat tonight. It was nowhere near like the humiliation of last year and the scoreline flatters them IMO.

I cannot comment of the style, just from the analysis offered. The difference is it sounds like they did it better, slicker and took there chances whereas we for much of the game dominated but failed to take ours due to being clueless in attack.

Sound Like Brown picked the tactits to win as they have been far from a dull side to date, yet Noble went with the same old tried tested and failed.

To laugh at the tactics employed by Brown which was a change from his style and try to justify Wigan's who can only play against a team that has the same crap defensive pattern as us does not hold water, and that is why I am critical, Sounds like and i have to say sounds like....same crap different week, whereas Hudds changed there tactics to winning ones.

: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:17 pm  

jonh wrote:

I cannot comment of the style, just from the analysis offered. The difference is it sounds like they did it better, slicker and took there chances whereas we for much of the game dominated but failed to take ours due to being clueless in attack.

Sound Like Brown picked the tactits to win as they have been far from a dull side to date, yet Noble went with the same old tried tested and failed.

To laugh at the tactics employed by Brown which was a change from his style and try to justify Wigan's who can only play against a team that has the same crap defensive pattern as us does not hold water, and that is why I am critical, Sounds like and i have to say sounds like....same crap different week, whereas Hudds changed there tactics to winning ones.

The wasn't at Brown's tactics it was at your hypocrisy. You consistently bleat about how you're more interested in exciting rugby than results but that was some dull rugby on display tonight from Huddersfield.

FWIW I applaud his tactics tonight. IMO you do whatever it takes to win.

: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:23 pm  

The crowds are dropping, the structure of the team is a Pathetic shambles and yet Noble & Cowardly lion Fielden are on top whack, the only mugs are the ones turning up every week..

: Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:27 pm  

Woody_woody wrote:

The wasn't at Brown's tactics it was at your hypocrisy. You consistently bleat about how you're more interested in exciting rugby than results but that was some dull rugby on display tonight from Huddersfield.

FWIW I applaud his tactics tonight. IMO you do whatever it takes to win.

No i do not, i "bleat" about performance. There is a major difference, something that you clearly cannot grasp.