: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:43 pm  

rhinoms wrote:

:lol:
It's all your fault

Thanks.

gee.

: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:43 pm  

RB wrote:

Starting at 6 keeping a Dally M rookie winner out of the team wasn't a major test...?

Lets put it this way noble at 6 would of been a better option than smith in his current form/state.
IIRC didn't smith play mostly at 7??

: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:45 pm  

Phuzzy wrote:

No just the one. That you are an idiot. Don't go taking continuous pops at someone and then when you've been shown up pretend you didn't mean it! You clearly thought I was a kid, so don't give me the plenty of people play with an X Box bollox! I tried to ignore your purile insults but you weren't having any.

"Insults aren't the way to go"? Isn't it funny how it's always the ones who think they should be able to use them without reply who come out with that argument...

honest mate if ive upset yeah then im very sorry. its only a forum. all the best and have a good day.

: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:49 pm  

sgtwilko wrote:

honest mate if ive upset yeah then im very sorry. its only a forum. all the best and have a good day.

Upset me? Please... I'm not a kid! (sarcasm alert)

: Thu Mar 12, 2009 8:56 pm  

sgtwilko wrote:

honest mate if ive upset yeah then im very sorry. its only a forum. all the best and have a good day.

Enjoy your quiz. Let somebody else answer the RL related questions tho.

: Thu Mar 12, 2009 11:56 pm  

Nogga wrote:

Enjoy your quiz. Let somebody else answer the RL related questions tho.

you should get some facts from your own threads before you post on ours as page 15 proves me 100% right.

i can only think that the case fuzz has to rest is the case that i made a comment based on fact re a page 15 comment.

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:04 am  

sgtwilko wrote:

you should get some facts from your own threads before you post on ours as page 15 proves me 100% right.

i can only think that the case fuzz has to rest is the case that i made a comment based on fact re a page 15 comment.

He said he was playing better,not that he was better. Also how is one persons opinion classed as "our lot"???

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:00 pm  

sgtwilko wrote:

you should get some facts from your own threads before you post on ours as page 15 proves me 100% right.

i can only think that the case fuzz has to rest is the case that i made a comment based on fact re a page 15 comment.

Let's get this straight shall we. After getting your ass soundly kicked on here you scuttle off to your own board and post the following:

there's a gem of a post on the wigan board where they are saying hock is better than peacock!! lololololol

it started out as hock is better than ablett then Wooooooooosssssshhhhhhh

lolololol

a few wins and they all have hard on's again. ya gotta love those pie's

So one person's opinion that, on current form, Hock is playing better than Peacock which was in direct answer to a question poted by you (!) is worthy of the above post.

lolololol

Ya gotta love an idiot.

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:30 pm  

What Happens When Gareth Hock Comes Up Against Leeds Rhinos...
Carl Ablett By Plenty!...

: Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:43 pm  

The Joker® wrote:

What Happens When Gareth Hock Comes Up Against Leeds Rhinos...
Carl Ablett By Plenty!...

Quite afew of Hocks dropped balls were ripped out and other than his errors he wasnt so poor tbh, your team had him and Feka marked up everytime they got the ball and had four players around them, we didnt need to do this for Ablett, Tomkins and Leuluai took care of him afew times.