Re: noble's time?? : Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:09 pm  

LeedsPokerGuru wrote:

Honestly I think the guy is a decent coach. I would like to see the club show patience but a club with wigans track record I would not be blown away should they part company in the next few weeks(results permitting).

As poor as wigan were tonight I think the coach needs time to ship certain players out or new coach brought in for the good of the comp.

We weren't great out wide tonight but you were soft up the middle. Would you get rid or give him time to clear out a few players???

A little bird tells me connected to an advisor of your club that Shaun Edwards has already been sounded out, but has rejected it due to being on a good screw with the rah-rahs ..... But one name that is certainly in the frame is the return of the prodigal son from Union .... ANDY FARRELL !

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:16 pm  

Quote Noble on GMR-''We gave our youngsters another experience of the high level of winning rugby that the opposition play''

Re: noble's time?? : Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:40 pm  

Jack Hargreaves wrote:

A little bird tells me connected to an advisor of your club that Shaun Edwards has already been sounded out, but has rejected it due to being on a good screw with the rah-rahs ..... But one name that is certainly in the frame is the return of the prodigal son from Union .... ANDY FARRELL !

This the same Andy Farrell who has allegedly just signed a 3 year coaching deal with Saracens?

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 6:56 pm  

Noble time? Is that like Chico time but with big old aussies dancing rather than youngsters?

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:17 pm  

jonh wrote:

:lol:

Massive against a team we should easily beat.

tbh sounds daft but we werent all that far off against leeds....they were just white hot for the first 30 mins....they would have posted all but one of those first tries on saints IMO and been 18 nil up against them. You cant really legislate for 2 freek 40-20s like they had.

We still have a good squad and a team capable of challenging if we get the selections right, as brian carney said on sky, dont write us off yet.

For me id go with much of the same for salford. Feka needs to start on the bench though for impact, fielden should be dropped at least to the bench if not completely for prescott, and I would bring in mossop for hock.

IMO that team should be well capable of putting 50 on salford.....30 on huddersfield, and building a bit of a momentum for sintellins.

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:18 pm  

what little patience i had left is wearing thin, and fast, as many have said, the 'youth' only get a chance because he has to pick them

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:26 pm  

andyed-wiganrl wrote:

tbh sounds daft but we werent all that far off against leeds....they were just white hot for the first 30 mins....they would have posted all but one of those first tries on saints IMO and been 18 nil up against them. You cant really legislate for 2 freek 40-20s like they had.

We still have a good squad and a team capable of challenging if we get the selections right, as brian carney said on sky, dont write us off yet.

For me id go with much of the same for salford. Feka needs to start on the bench though for impact, fielden should be dropped at least to the bench if not completely for prescott, and I would bring in mossop for hock.

IMO that team should be well capable of putting 50 on salford.....30 on huddersfield, and building a bit of a momentum for sintellins.

Are You?















ON GLUE!

: Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:46 pm  

Jukesays wrote:

Are You?


ON GLUE!

I dont know if you missed it earlier but he also said Wilkin is far more superior than Hock.

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:58 am  

Farrell will not replace Noble as head coach.

If he does, we are taking an insanely stupid risk.

: Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:21 am  

andyed-wiganrl wrote:

tbh sounds daft but we werent all that far off against leeds....they were just white hot for the first 30 mins....they would have posted all but one of those first tries on saints IMO and been 18 nil up against them. You cant really legislate for 2 freek 40-20s like they had.

We still have a good squad and a team capable of challenging if we get the selections right, as brian carney said on sky, dont write us off yet.

For me id go with much of the same for salford. Feka needs to start on the bench though for impact, fielden should be dropped at least to the bench if not completely for prescott, and I would bring in mossop for hock.

IMO that team should be well capable of putting 50 on salford.....30 on huddersfield, and building a bit of a momentum for sintellins.

I agree with this... Leeds were due a performance like that, I'm pretty sure that's where they were trying to be 2 weeks ago, we caught the backlash... not panick time by any means, Leeds will stick a lot of points on a lot of teams playing like this (they've done it to Saints in the last 2 GF's!)