: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:26 pm  

AJ wrote:

For real!?

Its what Ive heard.

: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:27 pm  

post wrote:

Its true! Mathers and Goulding going the other way.
He playing for us next week against Barrow.

Jesus...Warrington must be desperate.

: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:28 pm  

I thought he was after an NRL contract. Would be a great signing for you, but still needs a good pack to set him up.

: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:28 pm  

RB wrote:

But he's the scrum half of a World Cup winning team?

But yet he played 9 in the WC final and had his best game?

: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:29 pm  

IF we got rid of Mathers & Goulding for Gleeson then Noble & IL want knighthoods. Tony Smith would want his head checking.

: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:29 pm  

Don't they want Phelps instead of Goulding?

: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:30 pm  

RB wrote:

Don't they want Phelps instead of Goulding?

I wish!

: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:32 pm  

RB wrote:

:lol:

What's the score btw?

8-0 to us.

Mathers isn't playing nor have I seen him here and goulding has come off with a hamstring injury.

: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:33 pm  

: Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:34 pm  

If true, what you guys should be asking is why first of all Saints got rid of him to Warrington and now Warrington would appear to want to get rid.

This is despite him being a top class player.

It would point to a player with unresolvable issues elsewhere.