Re: Lockers : Sun Sep 29, 2013 9:24 pm  

We can win without him. It will be tough, but do-able. We will need everyone to play well. We will need another great game from Matty Smith, some magic from Sam and most importantly our pack to win the battle with Wire's. Lockers being out means we've lost the best forward in the comp but Farrell, Hansen, Mossop and McIlorum are at least as good as their Wolfs counterparts. Taylor will be very important too, this lad has the potential to be a special player.

If we do win without Lockers it will be a great achievement.

Re: Lockers : Mon Sep 30, 2013 9:11 am  

Deano G wrote:

We can win without him. It will be tough, but do-able. We will need everyone to play well. We will need another great game from Matty Smith, some magic from Sam and most importantly our pack to win the battle with Wire's. Lockers being out means we've lost the best forward in the comp but Farrell, Hansen, Mossop and McIlorum are at least as good as their Wolfs counterparts. Taylor will be very important too, this lad has the potential to be a special player.

If we do win without Lockers it will be a great achievement.

It would also mean our three most decorated players would be McIlorum, Hansen and Farrell, all with 2 SLs and 2 CCs. Not bad considering they can't have more than 10 international caps between them

Re: Lockers : Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:24 pm  

silly question but do you only get a medal if you are in the 17 or is it like football that if you have played so many matches through out the year but dont play the final one you will still get one

Re: Lockers : Mon Sep 30, 2013 1:05 pm  

markyp3172 wrote:

silly question but do you only get a medal if you are in the 17 or is it like football that if you have played so many matches through out the year but dont play the final one you will still get one

A medal is worthless if you haven't played, ask the players who come on the pitch in their suits to join the lap of honour.

Of course whether he plays or not Lockers has played a massive part in any success achieved by the team.

I find it interesting that three weeks ago people were posting saying that without him we can't possibly win, now the consensus seems to be we can do without him.

IMHO We can afford to put Lockers on the bench. The second rowers can do the full 80 and so can MMc. Bringing him on will give the players a big lift if we are losing. If we are winning, keep him until the second half. Having 4 replacements allows us that luxury.

Re: Lockers : Mon Sep 30, 2013 1:53 pm  

Not worth the risk, with all the experience we've lost over the last couple of seasons losing O'Loughlin for a big chunk of next season could be a step too far.

Re: Lockers : Mon Sep 30, 2013 1:58 pm  

i would play him just not in starting 13, let him have logan tomkins spot and see if McIlorum can do the full 80 if not bring lockers on. Its hardly a gamble as logan is still not good enough, when he came on against leeds we lost the forward battle, he tries hard just not good enough yet but he's still a baby really.

Re: Lockers : Mon Sep 30, 2013 2:18 pm  

Here's the latest http://www.wigantoday.net/sport/wigan-w ... -1-6099169 "But before then, and more importantly, he may learn whether he has a chance of playing in Saturday’s Grand Final against Warrington. The inspirational skipper will have a protective boot – which he has been wearing for the past four weeks - removed and an Achilles injury scanned. “I’ll hopefully find out then, whether I can play or not,” he said. “It’s not that I’m keeping my cards close to my chest, I genuinely won’t have an idea until I see the specialist, and he’s had another look at it."

Here's the latest http://www.wigantoday.net/sport/wigan-w ... -1-6099169 "But before then, and more importantly, he may learn whether he has a chance of playing in Saturday’s Grand Final against Warrington. The inspirational skipper will have a protective boot – which he has been wearing for the past four weeks - removed and an Achilles injury scanned. “I’ll hopefully find out then, whether I can play or not,” he said. “It’s not that I’m keeping my cards close to my chest, I genuinely won’t have an idea until I see the specialist, and he’s had another look at it."

Re: Lockers : Mon Sep 30, 2013 4:01 pm  

Chris Irvine on Twitter reckons the word is that Lockers will play.

Re: Lockers : Mon Sep 30, 2013 4:43 pm  

He very nearly played last week in the semi, he didn't have the protective boot on in the dressing room before the match. He must be very close for some involvement in the final.

Re: Lockers : Mon Sep 30, 2013 5:26 pm  

TheSurgeon wrote: He very nearly played last week in the semi, he didn't have the protective boot on in the dressing room before the match. He must be very close for some involvement in the final. Had it on after the game though. Apparantley Tony Smith knows more than lockers or the doctors http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... lin-return

TheSurgeon wrote: He very nearly played last week in the semi, he didn't have the protective boot on in the dressing room before the match. He must be very close for some involvement in the final. Had it on after the game though. Apparantley Tony Smith knows more than lockers or the doctors http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... lin-return