: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:54 pm  

Last Son of Wigan wrote:

Richards
Roberts Bailey Carmont Ainscough
Tomkins Smith
Fielden, Tommy, O Carroll
Hansen Lockers
Tomkins
-------------
Hock Feka McClorum Pryce

-------------

No room for Piggy Coley Mathers Phelps Goulding.

Don't like the bench. 3 props against Bradford?

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 4:56 pm  

4 props is a must against Bradford. I dont rate em but they sure have a massive pack

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:02 pm  

Hock hits the line like a prop. Far more effective at taking the ball up than lets say Coley.

Defensively Hansen, Hock, Lockers, Tomkins plus the on field prop won't have a problem with their pack.
Pryce adds size and cover in the backs and poss forwards.
Can't be doing with Coley full stop, sooner have my bench that introduce Prescott just yet, wanna give Pryce the nod.


But I do see your point.

Same Team As Last Week? : Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:02 pm  

I reckon keep same team as last week, but bring Sam T in a bit later than he did at Quins, maybe by 5 or 10 minutes... We had a strong side last week, there's no point in changing

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:03 pm  

agreed but get coley the hell out of this club

Re: Your team for Bradford : Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:09 pm  

Meyt N Prater Pie wrote:

I may get shot down here, I may not

1 Pat Richards
2 Amos Roberts
3 Phil Bailey
4 George Carmont
5 Sean Ainscough
6 Tim Smith
7 Tommy Leuluai
8 Eamon O'Carroll
9 Michael McIlorum
10 Stuart Fielden
11 Harrison Hansen
12 Joel Tomkins
13 Sean O'Loughlin

14 Gareth Hock
15 Paul Prescott
16 Feka
17 Sam Tomkins


No place for Riddell, Phelps, Daryl, Coley, Karl Pryce or Mathers. None of em deserve to play right now.

I'd go with that but probably play Joel at loose and Lockers in the second row.
Riddell can get game time in the reserves until he is fit enough.

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:53 pm  

jinkin jimmy wrote:

Seriously, what has he done that Pryce couldn't?

Well his try assist against Cas for a start

You reckon Pryce would of finsihed that intercept againts Quins?

I think people are getting on the backs of Riddell and Roberts way too early

Riddell hasn't played well but I thought he showed improvement on Saturday and when he sorts his fitness out I think he will come good for us

I think Roberts has the potential to be a belter. Took his try very well against Quins showing great pace. He has either been at full back, which wasn't going to be the best position to help him settle in and didn't do too bad apart from letting one ball bounce.

You have to look at the centre's playing inside him so far he's had Phelps and Bailey. Not many wingers would do too well with them inside them. If he had Carmont on his inside I think he would be doing an awful lot better and people would be saying what a good buy he is! I also doubt Ainscough would have had 3 tries in 2 games had Phelps and Bailey been his centres for the 2 games

: Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:03 pm  

1. Richards
2. Roberts
3. Bailey
4. Carmont
5. Ainscough
6. S. Tomkins
7. Smith
8. Fielden
9. Leuluai
10. Feka
11. Hock
12. Tomkins
13. O Loughlin

14. Hansen
15. McIlorum
16. Prescott
17. O Carroll

Re: Your team for Bradford : Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:21 pm  

[J-90] wrote:

I'd go with that but probably play Joel at loose and Lockers in the second row.
Riddell can get game time in the reserves until he is fit enough.

why would you swap them?

Re: Your team for Bradford : Mon Mar 02, 2009 6:22 pm  

injured wrote:

why would you swap them?

I can see his point, Tomkins is more of an attacking threat.