: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:27 am  

WigansForeignLegion wrote:

McIllorum - I suspect if he was fit he would have been picked ahead of Sam. After all, Mike Mc's form wasn't bad prior to the ban.

Well we will have to agree to disagree there he is to slow at the play of the ball he needs a spell on loan to speed up his game there is no point having 2 slow 9s on the field

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:30 am  

Andy Greg wrote:

Well we will have to agree to disagree there he is to slow at the play of the ball he needs a spell on loan to speed up his game there is no point having 2 slow 9s on the field

Take your point but I'm referring to the fact that Mike Mc was pickled ahead of Sam for the Cas and Hull games when both players were available.

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:33 am  

WigansForeignLegion wrote:

McIllorum - I suspect if he was fit he would have been picked ahead of Sam.

Didn't have a fitness problem, he was suspended.

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:35 am  

pokerface wrote:

Didn't have a fitness problem, he was suspended.

I knew what I meant given I'd already referred to his ban previously

I blame the coedine

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:45 am  

WigansForeignLegion wrote:

I knew what I meant given I'd already referred to his ban previously

I blame the coedine

Dont get upset with me just because you have a clueless camel immitating coach, who ould rather pick the over paid windy git Smith or obese Ridell, instead of the quality that lies in your youth.


Nevermind,do what wigan do best, let them get there first team experience with you and next season someone else will take them off your hands and prime them!!

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:46 am  

Mother Feka wrote:

And did his usual trait of dropping the ball at vital times in the game....

to be fair to him he had a better game after he got poked in the eye, it seemed to fire him up abit

I think Fielden had a good game, he was excellant in defense and carried the ball up well. The fact that quins scored all their points when he was off the pitch is no coincidence. One point he had the ball swotting off quins props and looking for an offload & Riddell was just there looking at him.

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:48 am  

pokerface wrote:

Dont get upset with me just because you have a clueless camel immitating coach, who ould rather pick the over paid windy git Smith or obese Ridell, instead of the quality that lies in your youth.


Nevermind,do what wigan do best, let them get there first team experience with you and next season someone else will take them off your hands and prime them!!

Get

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:48 am  

jjb10 wrote:

I think Fielden had a good game, he was excellant in defense and carried the ball up well. The fact that quins scored all their points when he was off the pitch is no coincidence. One point he had the ball swotting off quins props and looking for an offload & Riddell was just there looking at him.

Didn't he look pi55ed off when no-one wanted it

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:52 am  

kirkamania6 wrote:

Didn't he look pi55ed off when no-one wanted it

Yeah probably because he had 4 16st men trying to drag him down. (no puns), we should have had at least one back up player in support.

: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:56 am  

jjb10 wrote:

Yeah probably because he had 4 16st men trying to drag him down. (no puns), we should have had at least one back up player in support.

Cue the 'If Tommy was at hooker he would of been there' brigade

Eventhough i have to agree with them