: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:11 pm  

Oh Christ, can you imagine the posts from some of the not so clever people on here? They will see we've signed him and immediately assume it's too replace tomkins in the team, this board will meltdown I can't wait

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:22 pm  

MadDogg wrote:

Put it this way, if Lenagan can bring in Deacon as cover at halfback and also bring a prop in with one going out either on loan or permanently then we're very looking very good.

Exactly.

As I said before Deacon gives us options and cover for any possible problems we might have faced. If any of our HB’s or hookers are struggling with form or injury we can swap them in with the least amount of fuss or hassle.

I still think Tommy and Sam are good to start week in week out for a team that challenging but having Deacs around isn’t going to be that much of a bad thing really.

Very smart signing.

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:38 pm  

thepriestman85 wrote:

Exactly.

As I said before Deacon gives us options and cover for any possible problems we might have faced. If any of our HB’s or hookers are struggling with form or injury we can swap them in with the least amount of fuss or hassle.

I still think Tommy and Sam are good to start week in week out for a team that challenging but having Deacs around isn’t going to be that much of a bad thing really.

Very smart signing.

A smart signing would be Orford.

I have no idea where this speculation has come from regards Deacon, there is nothing in the article to suggest it is even under consideration.

Signing Deacon as cover in my opinion would be a non starter.

We lave the players to provide direction in the squad we do not need in my opinion to sign anybody else to give us this unless they are of top quality, which Deacon is not.

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:48 pm  

MadDogg wrote:

Put it this way, if Lenagan can bring in Deacon as cover at halfback and also bring a prop in with one going out either on loan or permanently then we're very looking very good.

Still think a prop is likely?

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:49 pm  

jonh wrote:

A smart signing would be Orford.

I wouldn't want Orford as I don't want 2 see any of our Hookers or HB's fall down the pecking order at Wigan.

All four of Piggy, Mcilorum, Sam and Tommy are good enough and I can't wait 2 see how they go under Maguire. It would have 2 be either a true superstar under 30 or a player like Eastmond that shifts them from the team IMO.

Orford won't come cheap nor will he come over as a back up so it's a none starter really!

Deacs isn't as good of a player but he's more of a fit.

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:57 pm  

thepriestman85 wrote:

I wouldn't want Orford as I don't want 2 see any of our Hookers or HB's fall down the pecking order at Wigan.

All four of Piggy, Mcilorum, Sam and Tommy are good enough and I can't wait 2 see how they go under Maguire. It would have 2 be either a true superstar under 30 or a player like Eastmond that shifts them from the team IMO.

Orford won't come cheap nor will he come over as a back up so it's a none starter really!

Deacs isn't as good of a player but he's more of a fit.

Would not mind McIllorum on loan if we could bring in someone of Orfords quality. For me Deacon is a massive no i would rather we look internally or around other junior structures there are 1 or 2 top quality junior halves available to provide cover who have the potential for long careers.

If you are signing someone on there way down they must in my opinion be top notch and while Deacon has been a good player I do not think he is a player we should even consider.

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:25 pm  

Ewwenorfolk wrote:

Spot on. The RFL don't care though as it makes the expansionism look better.

We all know the RFL can be useless but I hardly think the restrictions imposed on visas by the Immigration and Passport Agency can be laid at their door.

you make it sound as though they are in cahoots with the IPA which is giving them way too much credit as they aren't politically astute enough for that

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:52 pm  

jonh wrote:

Would not mind McIllorum on loan if we could bring in someone of Orfords quality. For me Deacon is a massive no i would rather we look internally or around other junior structures there are 1 or 2 top quality junior halves available to provide cover who have the potential for long careers.

Mcilorum’s place is at Wigan next season. The best thing for his development is to be working under the quality coaches we’ve brought in. I’d be very upset if we sent out a player who is about to hit a key time in his development to bring in another Aussie stop gap player.
In regards to the other youngsters who are ready i wouldn’t want to bring them through depending on what injuries we get. Say Piggy goes down with an injury for a few weeks we could realistically have
7-Mellor
6-Sam
Hooker interchange-Mcilorum

Thats not a good HB or hooker combo imo and put Deacon in at 7 instead and it’s not a bad situation whilst Piggy recovers.

If you are signing someone on there way down they must in my opinion be top notch and while Deacon has been a good player I do not think he is a player we should even consider

He’s just cover. You are talking like he’s going to be starting and he’s not and it’s a massive diff between the two

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:54 pm  

thepriestman85 wrote:

Mcilorum’s place is at Wigan next season. The best thing for his development is to be working under the quality coaches we’ve brought in. I’d be very upset if we sent out a player who is about to hit a key time in his development to bring in another Aussie stop gap player.
In regards to the other youngsters who are ready i wouldn’t want to bring them through depending on what injuries we get. Say Piggy goes down with an injury for a few weeks we could realistically have
7-Mellor
6-Sam
Hooker interchange-Mcilorum

Thats not a good HB or hooker combo imo and put Deacon in at 7 instead and it’s not a bad situation whilst Piggy recovers.


He’s just cover. You are talking like he’s going to be starting and he’s not and it’s a massive diff between the two

To be fair I had not seen the thread on the main board regarding him, if it works out and he is coming to coach and act as cover in case of injury only then i think it would indeed be a good move.

: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:43 pm  

If we sign Deacon then it won't be too far from Man Utd signing Owen he hasn't done too bad since he signed, & many of the Utd youngsters have already said how good it is to have another experienced player around. So if Deacon can improve Sammy then i'm very much in favour of the move.