Re: Rumours and signings v8 : Wed Oct 05, 2011 10:15 am
tank123 wrote:
If the RFL makes a million profit every year thats a start. Have a central contract system and pay for it with the money the RFL is making. £50k per player on average. Have reduced % on the cap per season a player which has come from the academy who you keep. Basically in 10 years nothing on the cap. More players we keep the more we challenge the OZ team the more revenue the RFL will make.
So if a player is on 50K and you reduce it 10% per year on a 2 year contract. in 2 years he will cost 30K on the contract but earn 50K. So when he comes to negotiate his next 2 year contract you pay him actually more than his worth if you can afford him knowing that 30% will come off the cap. The idea is that if the club can afford to pay more they can. Whilst the ones that cant can pay the player a bit less and use any additional savings from the % off the cap for other players.
So hyperthetically if this was done you would give the international player an extra 100k per year if the RFL and Club could afford it.
If by any chance you understand this please explain it to think i have confused myself.
So if a player is on 50K and you reduce it 10% per year on a 2 year contract. in 2 years he will cost 30K on the contract but earn 50K. So when he comes to negotiate his next 2 year contract you pay him actually more than his worth if you can afford him knowing that 30% will come off the cap. The idea is that if the club can afford to pay more they can. Whilst the ones that cant can pay the player a bit less and use any additional savings from the % off the cap for other players.
So hyperthetically if this was done you would give the international player an extra 100k per year if the RFL and Club could afford it.
If by any chance you understand this please explain it to think i have confused myself.
Bullshit baffles brains