: Mon Jun 08, 2009 11:25 am  

airliebird9 wrote:

Rafael Nadal will beat em both too.

I hear he might miss Wimbledon with an injury.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:05 pm  

changa wrote:

IT TOOK federer 6 years to win all 4 grand slams .sampras took over 10 years :D

Sampras never won the French Open. His best was a semi-final defeat to Kafelnikov

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 8:32 pm  

Rod Laver.

: Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:01 am  

changa wrote:

alot would say laver. but who has 14 grand slam titles . sampras- federa :wink:

Laver won the gand slam in the early 60's, then missed out for several years when he turned pro, then won the grand slam again when the game went open. Its fair to say he would have been streets ahead of Sampras & Federer but for that missing period.

: Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:55 am  

Cibaman wrote:

Laver won the gand slam in the early 60's, then missed out for several years when he turned pro, then won the grand slam again when the game went open. Its fair to say he would have been streets ahead of Sampras & Federer but for that missing period.

Wasn't grass the only surface in those days though?

: Tue Jun 09, 2009 1:24 pm  

clay has been around along time

: Thu Jun 11, 2009 8:09 am  

pistol pete as of NOW. but federer still has time on his side

: Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:23 am  

changa wrote:

clay has been around along time

Indeed, he was born January 17th 1942 in Louisville Kentucky but alas died in 1964 and became Ali

: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:02 pm  

changa wrote:

clay has been around along time

Yeah, pre-historic times. That's geology for you.

: Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:40 am  

federa is the legend like sampras