Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 1:52 am  

Ski wrote:

I can't think why. He has all the effectiveness as a kitten in tiger pen.

Like averaging 51 against them you mean?

Life for Cook.

Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:01 am  

86-2 at lunch, honours even and i'm done.

Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:02 am  

86-2 at lunch, fairly even but I'd say the Aussies just about edged it - hope Cook can make them pay for that missed chance.

Now I'm trying to decide whether to see it through or have a kip through the afternoon session and get up for the evening one!

Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 3:26 am  

KP gone c Ponting b Siddall 43

Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 3:35 am  

Collingwood is usually good for slow steady runs to steady up the ship.

Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 3:36 am  

Yed wrote:

Collingwood is usually good for slow steady runs to steady up the ship.

You were saying?

Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 3:39 am  

Disappointing batting from England, poor shots throwing wickets away against an attack that doesn't seem to be especially threatening.

The track looks pretty flat, and we are throwing it away.

Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 3:45 am  

Asim wrote:

Disappointing batting from England, poor shots throwing wickets away against an attack that doesn't seem to be especially threatening.

The track looks pretty flat, and we are throwing it away.

I can see us getting nailed here

Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 4:07 am  

Conroy wrote:

I can see us getting nailed here

We should have been looking at 400+ on this wicket, so we need these two to go on and make big runs if we are going to achieve at least par.

Cook's 50 up, at least he is playing a sensible innings.

Re: SUPER ENGLAND ASHES TOUR : Thu Nov 25, 2010 5:03 am  

172/4 at tea. Bell and Cook with 47 off 92.

Evening sesh just starting