The whole voting system is wrong, very worng. I don't understand how countries, in a fair bidding system can drop votes after round 1. Purely tactical voting that shouldn't really be allowed. It's not illegal, it just doesn't sit right. People on the FIFA Exec Commitee should not be "anti" any particular bid. There were members who were anti England and that is clear from the voting numbers.
What I do not understand is the small number who decide where the world cup is to be held. This encourages integrity laws to be breached. A dinner with the PM here, a friendly arranged there to secure votes. You can do that wih 24 members (before 2 were suspended) and that is legal. If that was upped to the full quota of FIFA international members (200 and odd) for example, it would surely lower the chance of "corruption" for want of a better word. Surely this would be fairer for the other nations to have a say too.
As far as the scottish debate goes, England on the whole doesn't really care about Scotland. Some of the bitter Jocks will be happy that we didn't get the World Cup and that's because they don't have much to celebrate in their own society. I was genuinely happy that Glasgow got the Commonwealth Games, and I would be routing for them to get a major tournament in any sport. As I see it it's on our door step and if, for example, Scotland and Ireland ever got the Euro's it would be great to have world class action that we can get to for relatively small cost and in a short space of time. The scots somehow relate this defeat to a failure to England as a football team, comparing Ryan Shawcross to Xavi for example (which is like comparing Steven Gerrard to someone like Francisco Punal). What has it got to do with our footballing ability? Are Qatar better than Spain all of a sudden? Despite the bitter nature towards our great country, I don't mind them they're harmless in sporting terms (but not when they threaten referees).