Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:10 pm  

Harrigan wrote:

We're entertaining this year

Anyway hopefully gamepass wont "blackout" our game because I cant stand Sky's coverage. Plus im looking forward to watching it in HD. I had a feeling we'd be the game shown though

gamepass is top notch through hdmi cable. Didn't need that stuff you were going on about. Well worth the money though.

Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:19 pm  

Mark wrote:

gamepass is top notch through hdmi cable. Didn't need that stuff you were going on about. Well worth the money though.

Yeah, my mate's coming around tonight and he has a HDMI port on his laptop. The quality on it is unbelievable. Better than Skysports HD IMO.

I cant see our game getting blacked out though because I reckon its too short notice to mess about with it all.... I hope

Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:47 pm  

Mark wrote:

Luck may go higher. How's Clausen coming along?

I wasn't putting them in order. I think Luck will be the highest pick followed by Newton.

My favourite of the lot though is Christian Ponder, not that he is the best but i really rate him.

Clausen is doing OK, and will be a good QB down the line. He's hardly been helped by having no RB's, Steve Smith injured (and they have no other recievers), no Jeff Otah.

Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:10 pm  

The metrodome roofs collapsed now

With the lease on the stadium about to run out it may be time to say hello to the Los Angeles Vikings

Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:36 pm  

LFCRhino wrote:

The metrodome roofs collapsed now

With the lease on the stadium about to run out it may be time to say hello to the Los Angeles Vikings

I hope not because then it'd break up our traditional rivalries. The LA Vikes would go in the West and St. Louis would come in the North.

Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:52 pm  

ST_CONROY wrote:

I hope not because then it'd break up our traditional rivalries. The LA Vikes would go in the West and St. Louis would come in the North.

I'm admittedly no expert on US geography but surely there are some teams more northern than us? Be a hell of a reach to put us in a northern division. Minds you we aren't exactly west.

Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:59 pm  

El Pac Carnegie wrote:

I'm admittedly no expert on US geography but surely there are some teams more northern than us? Be a hell of a reach to put us in a northern division. Minds you we aren't exactly west.

The reason we're in the West is obviously because of being the Los Angeles Rams before. I don't think they'd change the divisions if Minnesota did move as we stayed in the same one despite moving to Missouri. I'd be disappointed if that did happen as we're just starting to get good and we need revenge on Seattle, SF and Arizona over the next few years for all the defeats we've had in the last few nightmare seasons!

Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:25 pm  

El Pac Carnegie wrote:

I'm admittedly no expert on US geography but surely there are some teams more northern than us? Be a hell of a reach to put us in a northern division. Minds you we aren't exactly west.

It'd make the most sense.

LA Vikings would obviously be best in the division with San Fran. Moving you guys out and putting them in keeps that division pretty much all west coast teams.

You guys are close to us while the other close teams to Wisconsin, Ilinois and Michigan are the like of the Browns, Colts, Bengals. If you moved them to our division the LA Vikes would be on the opposite coast to the divison rivals they have.

Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:35 pm  

The Falcons used to be in the NFC West and the Cardinals in the East.

Explain that.

Re: The all new NFL Chat thread : Sun Dec 12, 2010 3:36 pm  

Before:


After:


You see!

This, is why we dont put a roof on the western terrace at Headingley... health and safety