Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:26 pm  

flipper wrote:

Me, hence the question
Just seemed strange

Maybe they wanted to get back on with the game as they thought they could win it? Just a thought.

Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:54 pm  

Lord Tony Smith wrote:

Maybe they wanted to get back on with the game as they thought they could win it? Just a thought.

mmmmmm, could be.

Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:47 pm  

Lord Tony Smith wrote:

Maybe they wanted to get back on with the game as they thought they could win it? Just a thought.

No, they went to Carragher and Gerrard. No one likes the Suaz, not even his teammates. He's a grub.

Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:37 pm  

flipper wrote:

Me, hence the question
Just seemed strange

From all accounts Suarez's team mates seem to love him. I've read interviews, stories from the press and so on and he seems as popular a figure as any at the club.

The only problem between Suarez and his team mates is the gulf in ability. People can't stand him but he's a truly brilliant player, if he had better team mates he'd be so much better as well IMO.

Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Tue Nov 13, 2012 7:56 am  

Saddened! wrote:

No, they went to Carragher and Gerrard. No one likes the Suaz, not even his teammates. He's a grub.

He's no Phil Neville that's for sure.

Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:20 pm  

Lord Tony Smith wrote:

He's no Phil Neville that's for sure.

you saying Phil Neville

doesn't bite opposition players?


trys finishing opposition players career's then feign injury himself?


pull hair?


or the holy trinity, stamp, dive, simulate injury all in one combo?

Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Tue Nov 13, 2012 11:50 pm  

flipper wrote:

or the holy trinity, stamp, dive, simulate injury all in one combo?

And then he went and pulled his own hair. I'm sure he bit his lip too.

Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:04 am  

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20321225 Peter Herbert - Society of Black Lawyers wrote: What on earth are the FA and Chelsea playing then? Are they having some cosy exchange of statements between themselves and not giving it to the police? What a complete and utter idiot. Football just needs to tell Herbert to do one. He's a complete fool and only using football to make a name for himself. The police getting involved in the John Terry case was the biggest hindrance to the case from all sides. They have no place intervening in football matters when the worst they could have punished Terry with was a £2,000 fine. The police and CPS just wasted police time and public money getting involved in something they had no business getting involved in.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20321225 Peter Herbert - Society of Black Lawyers wrote: What on earth are the FA and Chelsea playing then? Are they having some cosy exchange of statements between themselves and not giving it to the police? What a complete and utter idiot. Football just needs to tell Herbert to do one. He's a complete fool and only using football to make a name for himself. The police getting involved in the John Terry case was the biggest hindrance to the case from all sides. They have no place intervening in football matters when the worst they could have punished Terry with was a £2,000 fine. The police and CPS just wasted police time and public money getting involved in something they had no business getting involved in.

Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Wed Nov 14, 2012 8:08 am  

flipper wrote:

snip

Quality!

Re: Football Chat Thread PART II : Wed Nov 14, 2012 9:55 am  

Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/20321225

What a complete and utter idiot.

Football just needs to tell Herbert to do one. He's a complete fool and only using football to make a name for himself. The police getting involved in the John Terry case was the biggest hindrance to the case from all sides. They have no place intervening in football matters when the worst they could have punished Terry with was a £2,000 fine. The police and CPS just wasted police time and public money getting involved in something they had no business getting involved in.

Peter Herbert is nothing more than a sanctimonious, self-promoting, chip-on-shoulder racist nitwit. Twice i've heard him interviewed on TalkSport in the past month, he's not done himself any favours, including saying a white players union would be akin to the BNP He is poison, pure and simple, and the sooner his name disappears from the footballing circus the better.

He also threatened to report Spurs to the Met Police if they didn't take action to stop their fans saying the word 'Yid' in chants.