Re: Sack the Royal Family save money : Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:36 pm  

The Dors wrote:

I'm not so sure, I reckon they're at least a decent tourist attraction

Why?

Do tourists actually see them? I thought they looked at the buildings, not do a meet and greet

It's not as though you go to Egypt because they still have a pharoah, or Paris because they have royal family.

People visit for the history. We don't have to burn the palaces down, just get rid of the freeloaders.

Re: Sack the Royal Family save money : Wed Dec 09, 2009 3:45 pm  

aj cougar wrote:

Why?

Do tourists actually see them? I thought they looked at the buildings, not do a meet and greet

It's not as though you go to Egypt because they still have a pharoah, or Paris because they have royal family.

People visit for the history. We don't have to burn the palaces down, just get rid of the freeloaders.

Because people are dumb.

Re: Sack the Royal Family save money : Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:39 pm  

The Queen's a cow.

[Wheels]

Re: Sack the Royal Family save money : Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:11 pm  

What a random thread...

Re: Sack the Royal Family save money : Thu Dec 10, 2009 6:28 pm  

...Now, where's my pencil?
That's C-O-N-N-O-R added to the list...

Re: Sack the Royal Family save money : Thu Dec 10, 2009 8:41 pm  

Sorry,

I thought that you meant the Spencers!

Re: Sack the Royal Family save money : Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:13 pm  

Doesn't the first part of HMRC stand for Her Majesty's'?

If we were to by any chance............................................








or...............................







Would we owe anything?