Re: Well Well : Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:15 pm  

andysilsden wrote:

Dissent to the ref. Must be something they bring through the ranks at St Helens. I seem to remember Wilkin, Graham and 2 others surrounding the ref in a game a couple of years back.

There is only one person to blame and that is the ref.
He alone has the power to put a end to it.

At the first sign of it he should bin them or send them off.
If he did then it wouldn't happen again.

Re: Well Well : Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:50 pm  

Superb display,even if it was against the kids(they were huge).

As for the delay,somebody wants their backside kicking for that,how embarrassing.I was on the verge of walking out,very unprofessional OR WHAT.

As for the ref,is he a Cougar fan?

Does anyone know when we find out about points deduction?

Re: Well Well : Mon Jan 25, 2010 8:08 pm  

Hi all

I will be holding a full investigation as to why our equipment failed it's checks and i agree with you completely it made us look terrible.

The RFL are meeting on Friday the 29th to decide our fate so i am hoping we can make an announcement asap after then.

Thanks, Helen

Re: Well Well : Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:25 pm  

Wasnt a good begining of season showcase was it. If I was coming along for a taster session or a sponsor I wouldnt be happy. But have to say well done the lads showing spirit again. Cracking performance .

Re: Well Well : Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:49 am  

what equipment failed dare I ask?

Re: Well Well : Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:00 am  

StephanieM wrote:

what equipment failed dare I ask?

The pen for filling in the tax returns.

Re: Well Well : Tue Jan 26, 2010 9:20 am  

From what we heard, it was a defibrillator that was about ten minutes past it's 'use-by' date!
Well, I assume it was in date for the previous game against the amateurs?

Re: Well Well : Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:02 am  

aj cougar wrote:

The pen for filling in the tax returns.

Re: Well Well : Tue Jan 26, 2010 12:10 pm  

Its not good enough to say the equipment failed its checks.The equipment should be checked on a daily basis,and if batteries are flat or your defib pads are out of date then you should have spares.As for the Fire Service providing coverwhat would have happened if they are called out?If they leave a bloke with the defib then the appliance doesnt have one leaving the Officer in Charge in deep poo if its needed.

Re: Well Well : Tue Jan 26, 2010 12:22 pm  

Mick W. wrote:

From what we heard, it was a defibrillator that was about ten minutes past it's 'use-by' date!
Well, I assume it was in date for the previous game against the amateurs?

It was rather shocking wasn't it?