: Fri Sep 11, 2009 8:30 am
guess who wrote: I cant believe this thread got so many bites with such poor bait.
Its like using a ships rope and anchor to catch a fish.
All way to easy
Having said that, this could actually turn into a worthwhile debate!
As I see it the problem with a feeder club system is that the super league club will want to be dominant rather than it being a true partnership.
Let’s face it they want:
Your Fans
Your sponsors
Your promising youngsters
A chunk of your share of the sky money (which they don’t think you deserve to have anyway)
To put their people into schools in your catchment area so they can gain more publicity and further the above.
Ultimately they may argue that it would be more convenient for you to play out of their ground to reduce costs.
The whole thrust for a super league club (like any business) is to reduce running costs and maximise revenue. THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT CHAMPIONSHIP RUGBY, EXCEPT TO USE IT TO FURTHER THEIR NEEDS.
You could imagine a scenario where you play against a team who have six promising super league youngsters – you loose. Your competitor plays them two months later and beats them because the youngsters have now been re-called. Is that fair?
Or, on the day of the signing deadline for the playoffs a side drafts in half a dozen super league youngsters.
If these things are run as true partnerships with safeguards in place (for both parties) they may work. However, some of the “big” clubs are taking a long term view, and that does not include championship rugby as we know it.