Why does the club seem to think there is little problem, and the new 2010 Cougars will take over - isn't this down to the administrator that gets appointed?
The main creditor appears to be HMRC - why would they accept less from an administrator when they were already quite prepared to see the club wound up on the 9th?
Doesthis mean other creditors suffer for the sake of HMRC?
Is all the above another display of the arrogance that has been endemic in the running of the club in its present guise and alienated so many supporters?
How deceitful have the current club been in their dealings with supporters - given the first question above, how can they guarantee season tickets will be honoured? Can they guarantee that now, today? (If the answer is no, everything thing said so far is about as stable and trustworthy as a house built on quicksand)
Is it an administrators duty to look after Cougars, or to obtain the best deal for the creditors? (Actually we all know the answer to that one)
Wouldn't the administrator be liable to civil proceedings by creditors if he failed to obtain the best deal for creditors by going along with some cosy deal already agreed in the background?
Dependent on the answers to the above, is there some confusion between hope and fact at the club and on the part of some posters?