Barrow performance : Mon Feb 06, 2017 5:40 pm  

"Dispirited performance possibly not surprising if owner pockets a

Re: Barrow performance : Mon Feb 06, 2017 8:19 pm  

red and screws back for the pink?

Re: Barrow performance : Mon Feb 06, 2017 9:25 pm  

Edit by gueess who, admin.

Unless you have proof which you will stand up in court and use. Do not put rlfans in danger again by posting things like that.

Re: Barrow performance : Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:22 am  

...spends it all on sweets.

Re: Barrow performance : Tue Feb 07, 2017 11:53 am  

Mr Churchill wrote:

"Dispirited performance possibly not surprising if owner pockets a

Mr Churchill wrote:

yes it is close to libel. Edit by guess who admin

Aren't you getting into murky waters with libel laws there without any evidence?

Re: Barrow performance : Tue Feb 07, 2017 1:08 pm  

Mr Churchill wrote:

Edit by gueess who, admin.

Unless you have proof which you will stand up in court and use. Do not put rlfans in danger again by posting things like that.

Well done Guess Who. Its time this Churchhill person stopped it. Its now sounding more like a vendetta. He obviously leads a very sad life.

Re: Barrow performance : Tue Feb 07, 2017 1:58 pm  

Mr Churchill wrote:

Edit by gueess who, admin.

Unless you have proof which you will stand up in court and use. Do not put rlfans in danger again by posting things like that.

Firstly, anybody who went to Barrow to start with will know we didn't go as bad as the result suggests, the Raiders were clinical in the first half and punished every little error we made.

Secondly, Churchill clearly has the intelligence capacity at a level of which my two year old son would be embarrassed. Take your vendetta elsewhere.