: Tue Feb 17, 2009 9:26 pm  

I heard that they were assisted / funded / sponsored by the Welsh tourist board.They have seen how well Catalan have done and how much money has been brought into the local economy by the travelling fans and realised if their team can get in SL look how well the local economy will benefit.

But granted there is a slight difference from Canet Plage and Brigend !!!!!!!

: Tue Feb 17, 2009 10:14 pm  

Fred Gee wrote:

I heard that they were assisted / funded / sponsored by the Welsh tourist board.They have seen how well Catalan have done and how much money has been brought into the local economy by the travelling fans and realised if their team can get in SL look how well the local economy will benefit.

But granted there is a slight difference from Canet Plage and Brigend !!!!!!!

That was the Millennium Magic weekend, not the Crusaders.

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 2:19 am  

been said for years, funny how its a problem now their in SL, last year nobody could wait for them to be there.

I think they want another Welsh team in SL so look forward to your trips to Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch Lions RLFC

Re: Eddie "theres lovely, boyo, daf-o-dil" Hemmings : Wed Feb 18, 2009 9:24 am  

Wes Hooligan wrote:

So are you suggesting that Leighton Samuels works for, or 'is' the RFL? Or that Celtic were 'guaranteed a franchise by super league', despite the fact that 'Super League' refers to majority decisions made by the club chairmen, and that they were not responsible for the licencing decisions? If so have you any evidence to back this up, or are you just going to come up with some more hilarious jokes about 'ventrilaquists'?

I am not suggesting anything because off hand I do not have an opinion on it but Kinleycat does. He is a Wakey fan on the Wakey board and is entitled to his opinion. You obviously dont agree with him, but you dont seem to have the mentality to put forward a rational argument against him so you do the usual thing and hurl abuse. If you want to hear people generally talking out of their @rses' I could suggest a couple of boards to go on but being an expert you probably know who they are anyway

Re: Eddie "theres lovely, boyo, daf-o-dil" Hemmings : Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:27 am  

chissitt wrote:

I am not suggesting anything because off hand I do not have an opinion on it but Kinleycat does. He is a Wakey fan on the Wakey board and is entitled to his opinion. You obviously dont agree with him, but you dont seem to have the mentality to put forward a rational argument against him so you do the usual thing and hurl abuse. If you want to hear people generally talking out of their @rses' I could suggest a couple of boards to go on but being an expert you probably know who they are anyway

WH has tended to keep things factual.

Some posters state opinions as if they were facts - common among people with limited intelligence. When challenged to produce anything factual these people often resort to rumour or childish conspiracy theories.

WH did not challenge an opinion that was anti Crusaders. he challenged the claim that the RFL bankrolled the Crusaders and guarenteed them a place in SL. So if WH is wrong where is the evidence backing the bankrolling statement?

Re: Eddie "theres lovely, boyo, daf-o-dil" Hemmings : Wed Feb 18, 2009 10:48 am  

Marsdengiant wrote:

WH has tended to keep things factual.

Some posters state opinions as if they were facts - common among people with limited intelligence. When challenged to produce anything factual these people often resort to rumour or childish conspiracy theories.

WH did not challenge an opinion that was anti Crusaders. he challenged the claim that the RFL bankrolled the Crusaders and guarenteed them a place in SL. So if WH is wrong where is the evidence backing the bankrolling statement?

I hope to God the RFL arent bank rolling them.
They are already starting to amass County Court Judgements - one awarded against them in Jan 09 ,jeez before the season even started.

Re: Eddie "theres lovely, boyo, daf-o-dil" Hemmings : Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:18 am  

Marsdengiant wrote:

WH has tended to keep things factual.

Some posters state opinions as if they were facts - common among people with limited intelligence. When challenged to produce anything factual these people often resort to rumour or childish conspiracy theories.

WH did not challenge an opinion that was anti Crusaders. he challenged the claim that the RFL bankrolled the Crusaders and guarenteed them a place in SL. So if WH is wrong where is the evidence backing the bankrolling statement?

some posters make smug remarks to make themselves look intelligent - common amongst posters who are bell ends

Re: Eddie "theres lovely, boyo, daf-o-dil" Hemmings : Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:52 am  

Snat Chunter wrote:

some posters make smug remarks to make themselves look intelligent - common amongst posters who are bell ends

Do they now. oh dear

: Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:33 pm  

Another thread that promised so much to so many,
but delivered so little to so few....