chapster wrote:
Catnap wrote:
So you would prefer to lose two prospective top young Brits in favour of two foreigners
That IMO is what is wrong with our game, too many people yearn for antipodeans rather than see our own blossom, and too many clubs bow to the pressure of the fans wanting foreign signings.[/quote
yes i would i dont care if they come from mars so long as they play well for wtrlfc
in my opinion whats wrong with the international game is not going to be resolved by issues at belle vue in next 3 to 5 years. answer me one then who would you have matt gidley or ryan atkins?
That IMO is what is wrong with our game, too many people yearn for antipodeans rather than see our own blossom, and too many clubs bow to the pressure of the fans wanting foreign signings.[/quote
yes i would i dont care if they come from mars so long as they play well for wtrlfc
in my opinion whats wrong with the international game is not going to be resolved by issues at belle vue in next 3 to 5 years. answer me one then who would you have matt gidley or ryan atkins?
TBH I don't give a toss about the international game, if England never win another game it wouldn't bother me in the slightest, if there were no Wakefield trinity wildcats I wouldn't be a RL fan so what we do for the international game is irrelevent as far as I'm concerned. as for your question, Ryan Atkins every time old lad, he's a localish lad, he came to us at a young age and I have had the chance to see him grow and improve at our club, give me that every time over bringing in an antipodean with whom I have no affiliation whatsoever.