Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:57 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

1873 membership keeping the youth allready against there word then?

No. The 1873 funding is aimed at attracting and keeping juniors/academy players, not first team regulars.

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:59 pm  

Liversedge Wildcat wrote:

Happy with this , however I would have liked Kyle Wood because I think he has a great future in the game. I know I wiil get lambasted for this but I have watched Aaron from an early age and whilst he is not a bad player, he is not a player who can break a game and we really need this with both our first choice centres. Huuddersfield are having to offload some players to stay within the salary cap having offered our ex players such good deals.

It might well happen yet as a swap for Lee.

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:00 pm  

he is still a academy product. They get over 20 grand a month for this scheme i would give them permission to use it to keep Smurph .

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:01 pm  

who is rayleigh you keep mentioning? Will be great for you next year. 7/8th spot i'd say for the wildcats, just need another prop and a recognised half

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:04 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

he is still a academy product. They get over 20 grand a month for this scheme i would give them permission to use it to keep Smurph .

Apart from the fact that your permission is neither here nor there, have you actually read the press release? They tried to keep him, didn't want to lose him, but the player wanted to go.

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:05 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

he is still a academy product. They get over 20 grand a month for this scheme i would give them permission to use it to keep Smurph .

He didn't want to stay. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:11 pm  

RebelRebel wrote:

Apart from the fact that your permission is neither here nor there, have you actually read the press release? They tried to keep him, didn't want to lose him, but the player wanted to go.

Whatever they didnt try hard enough did they? HYDE and HENDO vievers etc get rid of them but once again we fail to keep our best players end of story ... Solomona for Ferres and cash ´ .... yes we got the best deal lol.

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:12 pm  

Theboyem wrote:

He didn't want to stay. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?

He did many of us spoke to him. we should be able to match shudds offer but we havent its a joke

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:13 pm  

Mable_Syrup wrote:

who is rayleigh you keep mentioning? Will be great for you next year. 7/8th spot i'd say for the wildcats, just need another prop and a recognised half

Please leave our club to get on with it you vulturing pest

Re: Kirmond & Raleigh in, Murphy out. : Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:16 pm  

newgroundb4cas wrote:

He did many of us spoke to him. we should be able to match shudds offer but we havent its a joke

He is hardly going to tell a group of fans he can't wait to leave is he? He turned down a very good 3 year deal with us to sign with the giants. What does that tell you? The proof of the pudding is in the eating, he wanted out. Move on, he has.