newwildcat wrote:
No offence - but signing burrow - doesn't ring true. It's unlikely he would leave in his testimonial year. For that reason I'm hoping youre source is mistaken and we don't end up with Agar. However, that might just be wishful thinking on my part.
I am not offended newwildcat and have to agree it does seem a bit strange, however we dont know if the money he could have been offered would outweigh the proposed income of a testimonial. I would imagine he is a bit cheesed at not starting regular.
I would love to name the moles but wouldnt want to get them into trouble. Lets just see what happens.