Re: 6 Bulls. : Thu Feb 27, 2014 3:19 pm
wrencat1873 wrote:
Unless it is a direct instruction from The RFL, I don't see how the administrator could ring fence their assets if someone offered the right money.
Crikey, the administrators couldn't wait to sell our players off and they didn't get anywhere near market price.
One issue that has not had a mention up to now but, where is the administrator getting his income from, baring in mind there is no ST revenue and heavily reduced numbers turning up to watch, it is likely that The RFL are funding them ??, which begs the question as to just how long they can, or will continue.
First of all they had 28 days (now expired) but someone with very deep pockets is going to have to come along real soon.
Crikey, the administrators couldn't wait to sell our players off and they didn't get anywhere near market price.
One issue that has not had a mention up to now but, where is the administrator getting his income from, baring in mind there is no ST revenue and heavily reduced numbers turning up to watch, it is likely that The RFL are funding them ??, which begs the question as to just how long they can, or will continue.
First of all they had 28 days (now expired) but someone with very deep pockets is going to have to come along real soon.
Not quite. The administrator is acting on behalf of the creditors and his job is to get the best deal for them. All club incomes go to him and he decides if and when to pay any bills eg wages. His primary concern is to ensure that his costs are covered hence when we were in admin he sold player after player to meet his own costs. All season ticket monies will have been spent as will have the sponsorships and RFL money to date so he will only have the gate receipts and the RFL monthly funding to cover costs so the longer Bulls go without a definite buyer the harder it becomes to maintain the business as a going concern.
The fate of the Bulls is entirely at the administrator's discretion and the most surprising thing is that they got through the last administration relatively unscathed when if the administrator had been doing a proper job he would have liquidated more assets to pay creditors. His actions were disingenius at best and probably unlawful.