: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:20 am  

I think the fact that Reardon is crap is more relevant than his bad-boy status.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:20 am  

he is too injury prone, not for me thanks!

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:32 am  

Wollo-Wollo-Wollo-Wayoo wrote:

I think the fact that Reardon is crap is more relevant than his bad-boy status.

Why would we want him, he's not good enough as you say.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:00 am  

wouldn't surprise me if wigan make a cheap bid for him, they need a full back as they was shown wanting last night and the stains only took advantage of it only once

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:36 am  

Reardon was offered to us in the Ellis deal. He didn't want to come then and we don't need him now.
End of!

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:51 am  

TRB wrote:

Reardon was offered to us in the Ellis deal. He didn't want to come then and we don't need him now.
End of!

TBF if memory serves, he did it was Langly who considered himself too good for us. Either way it's too late now.

: Fri Apr 10, 2009 2:10 pm  

vastman wrote:

TBF if memory serves, he did it was Langly who considered himself too good for us. Either way it's too late now.

As well!

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 3:13 pm  

http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league/hull_fc/news/displayarticle.php?ID=12182 Signed for Hull

http://www.sporthull.co.uk/rugby_league/hull_fc/news/displayarticle.php?ID=12182 Signed for Hull

Re: reardon : Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:31 pm  

Outwood Vic wrote:

do you just trawl the board looking for an argument..................t*t!

read the post.................is this one bad boy too many?

i think so (in other words he doesn't want him!!!!)

No need for the language.

: Sat Apr 11, 2009 4:31 pm  

Bad signing by Hull.