: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:07 pm  

Gahan wrote:

Oddly enough, we are getting one letter for high knees (Raleigh) while you are getting 2 (Webster and Fozzard)

Funny how the RFL see things differently from one eyed home supporters

Now which was the dirty side again?

not much of a toss up is it, double headed coin or what

: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:17 pm  

snowie wrote: not much of a toss up is it, double headed coin or what You miss this one old boy http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=916

snowie wrote: not much of a toss up is it, double headed coin or what You miss this one old boy http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=916

: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:18 pm  

Gahan wrote: You miss this one old boy http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=916 no charge

Gahan wrote: You miss this one old boy http://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplin ... php?id=916 no charge

: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:23 pm  

snowie wrote:

no charge

Thought we had the monopoly on grapple tackles, seems not

: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:39 pm  

Gahan wrote:

Thought we had the monopoly on grapple tackles, seems not

you see my lad got a warning the other day, tallest in the team and his back won't bend to get down

: Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:17 pm  

Gahan wrote:

Oddly enough, we are getting one letter for high knees (Raleigh) while you are getting 2 (Webster and Fozzard)

Funny how the RFL see things differently from one eyed home supporters

Now which was the dirty side again?

it's interesting you put so much store into the disciplinary records because I happened to be at work and a bit bored on nights and had a look at the referrals since the season started for all clubs, here's the grapple tackle and chicken wing tackles that were referred (and before you say it most were not charged.)

Bradford 0
Cas 1 grapple
Catalans 2 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Celtics 1 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Quins 0 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Hull 1 grapple
Rovers 0
Leeds 1 grapple, 4 chicken wing
Saints 2 grapple
Salford 1 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Wakey 1 grapple, 2 chicken wing
Warrington 0
Wigan 1 grapple, 1 chicken wing

and of course last but most definately not least,

Hudds 7 grapple, 2 chicken wing

so tell this one eyed home supporter again mr gahan, and while your at it mssrs Noble, mcnamara and morgan, there's nothing dodgy about your "defensive tactics" this year under brown.

(apologies to wakey fans for going on a bit in an effort to put right a one eyed away supporter )

: Wed Apr 15, 2009 12:26 am  

sandy wrote:

it's interesting you put so much store into the disciplinary records because I happened to be at work and a bit bored on nights and had a look at the referrals since the season started for all clubs, here's the grapple tackle and chicken wing tackles that were referred (and before you say it most were not charged.)

Bradford 0
Cas 1 grapple
Catalans 2 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Celtics 1 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Quins 0 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Hull 1 grapple
Rovers 0
Leeds 1 grapple, 4 chicken wing
Saints 2 grapple
Salford 1 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Wakey 1 grapple, 2 chicken wing
Warrington 0
Wigan 1 grapple, 1 chicken wing

and of course last but most definately not least,

Hudds 7 grapple, 2 chicken wing

so tell this one eyed home supporter again mr gahan, and while your at it mssrs Noble, mcnamara and morgan, there's nothing dodgy about your "defensive tactics" this year under brown.

(apologies to wakey fans for going on a bit in an effort to put right a one eyed away supporter )

Thought we were on about the game on sunday, we moving the posts to suit now


You answered your own question, not one charged, all not guilty

You lost, move on

: Wed Apr 15, 2009 6:24 am  

sandy wrote:

it's interesting you put so much store into the disciplinary records because I happened to be at work and a bit bored on nights and had a look at the referrals since the season started for all clubs, here's the grapple tackle and chicken wing tackles that were referred (and before you say it most were not charged.)

Bradford 0
Cas 1 grapple
Catalans 2 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Celtics 1 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Quins 0 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Hull 1 grapple
Rovers 0
Leeds 1 grapple, 4 chicken wing
Saints 2 grapple
Salford 1 grapple, 1 chicken wing
Wakey 1 grapple, 2 chicken wing
Warrington 0
Wigan 1 grapple, 1 chicken wing

and of course last but most definately not least,

Hudds 7 grapple, 2 chicken wing

so tell this one eyed home supporter again mr gahan, and while your at it mssrs Noble, mcnamara and morgan, there's nothing dodgy about your "defensive tactics" this year under brown.

(apologies to wakey fans for going on a bit in an effort to put right a one eyed away supporter )

fair dos to warrington but I don't think they have even attempted to tackle as yet

: Wed Apr 15, 2009 9:29 am  

Seems Justin remarks may well have landed him in trouble, is it possible that the RFL may try and stop this 'dissent' by making an example of him http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 61,00.html

Seems Justin remarks may well have landed him in trouble, is it possible that the RFL may try and stop this 'dissent' by making an example of him http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 61,00.html

: Wed Apr 15, 2009 1:01 pm  

IngsRoader wrote: Seems Justin remarks may well have landed him in trouble, is it possible that the RFL may try and stop this 'dissent' by making an example of him http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 61,00.html And rightly so imo. Another classic case of spitting his dummy out. All SL coaches' experience this during the season some more than others. The difference being most take defeat graciously in public. This fellah like their fans seem to think they are different to the rest of us. It isnt as though they just lost, by the score it looks like they were soundly beaten. Having said they were going to win the play offs' and then lose at home to lowly Hudds I suppose though he had to target somebody for an excuse. And who better than the poor old ref

IngsRoader wrote: Seems Justin remarks may well have landed him in trouble, is it possible that the RFL may try and stop this 'dissent' by making an example of him http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528, ... 61,00.html And rightly so imo. Another classic case of spitting his dummy out. All SL coaches' experience this during the season some more than others. The difference being most take defeat graciously in public. This fellah like their fans seem to think they are different to the rest of us. It isnt as though they just lost, by the score it looks like they were soundly beaten. Having said they were going to win the play offs' and then lose at home to lowly Hudds I suppose though he had to target somebody for an excuse. And who better than the poor old ref