Re: usual scapegoats : Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:33 pm  

No band-wagon jumping for me and I'm not completely anti Blaymire - he does ok under the high ball and is generally safe; I guess I would just prefer to see him return the ball with a bit more aggression and not tackle himself so readily. We are all, are we not, entitled to our opinions?

That said, I'd dearly love him to prove me wrong against Wigan tomorrow; I'll be there, so if you bring the humble pie, I'd be happy to have to scoff it!

Re: usual scapegoats : Sun Apr 04, 2010 2:42 pm  

bren2k wrote:

No band-wagon jumping for me and I'm not completely anti Blaymire - he does ok under the high ball and is generally safe; I guess I would just prefer to see him return the ball with a bit more aggression and not tackle himself so readily. We are all, are we not, entitled to our opinions?

That said, I'd dearly love him to prove me wrong against Wigan tomorrow; I'll be there, so if you bring the humble pie, I'd be happy to have to scoff it!

Everyone is entitled to an opinion and everyone else is entitled to disagree with those opinions. It's got to the point with Matty where some go into the game having already decided he's not running it in hard enough. If anyone can find a better, affordable full back then fair enough but I think you'll struggle.

Re: usual scapegoats : Sun Apr 04, 2010 4:09 pm  

J.T wrote:

Everyone is entitled to an opinion and everyone else is entitled to disagree with those opinions. It's got to the point with Matty where some go into the game having already decided he's not running it in hard enough. If anyone can find a better, affordable full back then fair enough but I think you'll struggle.

Booooooooooooooooooo!

Re: usual scapegoats : Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:13 pm  

J.T wrote:

Everyone is entitled to an opinion and everyone else is entitled to disagree with those opinions. It's got to the point with Matty where some go into the game having already decided he's not running it in hard enough. If anyone can find a better, affordable full back then fair enough but I think you'll struggle.

Is opinion/criticism only valid if there is a suitable alternative available at any given time?

Re: usual scapegoats : Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:29 pm  

Tommy Duckfingers wrote:

Is opinion/criticism only valid if there is a suitable alternative available at any given time?

on here it is

Re: usual scapegoats : Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:30 pm  

lad13 wrote:

With the pitch and ball really slippy I thought Blaymire was outstanding and didnt miss a tackle or drop a ball (to the best of my knowledge) all night long. Was my m.o.m & felt he was as safe as houses. I must watch a different game sometimes.

yes you must

Re: usual scapegoats : Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:02 am  

Tommy Duckfingers wrote:

Is opinion/criticism only valid if there is a suitable alternative available at any given time?

Strange that those who bleat about their opinions not being valid/listened to seem to have a problem with other people expressing their opinions!

For me the criticism/opinion on Blaymire is not valid regardless of a suitable alternative as I think he is a quality player but that is just my 'opinion'!

Re: usual scapegoats : Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:03 am  

MUTLEY CAT wrote:

Booooooooooooooooooo!

Very BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

Re: usual scapegoats : Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:00 am  

J.T wrote:

Strange that those who bleat about their opinions not being valid/listened to seem to have a problem with other people expressing their opinions!

For me the criticism/opinion on Blaymire is not valid regardless of a suitable alternative as I think he is a quality player but that is just my 'opinion'!

dont agree , its a public forum which means im right all the time

double booooooooooooooooooooooooo