Mild Rover wrote:
It might possibly come across as a bit patronizing that you think Wakefield would take your young players on loan to help them (the player) develop, rather than give their own kids a shot - they're not a farm team, after all.
All due respect to the Championship clubs, but if Lynn (sp?) isn't good enough for Hull (yet), he might be good enough for that level. Wakefield got a franchise.
The rest of the list are well-liked but fairly unthreatening. Obst is good, but that is about freeing up his quota spot as cheaply as possible. Though he is rumoured to be due for an UK passport.
One consolation for Wakey fans is that Agar's 'failures' were partly down to these sort of perceptions leading to unrealistic expectations. All IMO, and I'm naturally biassed too, of course.
Point taken and agree it may have come across as patronizing, I apologise but that was not my Intention. I appreciate Wakey may have thier own kids, I was throwing Lynn in there as potential player that Agar may sign. It makes no difference to me where Lynn goes, I just want to see him play week in week out for him to develop. The fact Agar has seen him train every week and knows about his potential is ehy I thought he may be an option as a loan signing. I was not meaning to say Wakey should take our Youngster and develop them but that Agar may have an interest in these particular players as he has first hand knowledge of them and may feel he can temp them to wakefield on a long term basis in the future as we did with Carvell, Raynor and Dowes from Leeds.
