Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:03 pm  

not with him its not, he'll be starting.

Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:12 pm  

Mable_Syrup wrote:

not with him its not, he'll be starting.

Then he shouldnt have been signed, we have players who can be better than him and 2/3 second rowers better than him in my opinion in Mariano, Southern and Morrison. hes not a starting prop either so unless hes starting at LF which should be either Washbrook or Howarth i cant see where he will be starting. Nobody should be starting automatically especially with the squad we have.

Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:14 pm  

Happy with Slats signing, not happy releasing Howarth http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... m/2011/11/

Happy with Slats signing, not happy releasing Howarth http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... m/2011/11/

Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:20 pm  

Surprised at this,thought Howarth might have been kept on. It will though free up some cap space. The rest I agree with. No mention of Hendo though!

Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:21 pm  

Wildcat-Rich wrote:

Then he shouldnt have been signed, we have players who can be better than him and 2/3 second rowers better than him in my opinion in Mariano, Southern and Morrison. hes not a starting prop either so unless hes starting at LF which should be either Washbrook or Howarth i cant see where he will be starting. Nobody should be starting automatically especially with the squad we have.

Agar has signed people because he believes they are better than what was at Wakey, be that Raleigh, Kirmond, wood, Washbrook etc Obviously as the season goes on things can change but Agar has in mind his best 17 and i'm pretty sure that at this moment in time Andy is in that.

Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:23 pm  

1873 wrote: Happy with Slats signing, not happy releasing Howarth http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... m/2011/11/ Errrmmm according to Stu hes not been released, just posted on his facebook wall that i was sorry hed been released and he said he hadnt been released and deleted it off??? possibly another cock up to go with matt james?

1873 wrote: Happy with Slats signing, not happy releasing Howarth http://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/news ... m/2011/11/ Errrmmm according to Stu hes not been released, just posted on his facebook wall that i was sorry hed been released and he said he hadnt been released and deleted it off??? possibly another cock up to go with matt james?

Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:25 pm  

Mable_Syrup wrote:

Agar has signed people because he believes they are better than what was at Wakey, be that Raleigh, Kirmond, wood, Washbrook etc Obviously as the season goes on things can change but Agar has in mind his best 17 and i'm pretty sure that at this moment in time Andy is in that.

Thats good then so before hes seen any of the players in training and combination's in matches hes decided his starting 17. might as well tell the rest of them to stay at home.

Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:26 pm  

Wildcat-Rich wrote:

Errrmmm according to Stu hes not been released, just posted on his facebook wall that i was sorry hed been released and he said he hadnt been released and deleted it off??? possibly another cock up to go with matt james?

Maybe just the wording, mutual decision?

@StuHowarth1 Stu Howarth
Sad to have left wakey but was best for both! Good club!!
3 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone

Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:30 pm  

1873 wrote:

Maybe just the wording, mutual decision?

@StuHowarth1 Stu Howarth
Sad to have left wakey but was best for both! Good club!!
3 minutes ago via Twitter for iPhone

Possibly after he deleted it off i did message him with the article. It would be nice though if the club actually mentioned at leased him, smith and Vievers in an article not at the bottom of 1. As they made more of a contribution than Penny.

Re: not retained/ retired/transferred : Fri Nov 04, 2011 3:40 pm  

thought howarth should have been kept. he impressed well early on in the season. then he got unlucky with an injury and everyones form dipped towards the end anyway. thought he would be worth another year to develop properly with the experience and knowledge of some class 2nd rowers in ali, southern and morro.

also, i think morrison wont be playing much this season. i think he will be more of a rotation or back up player to allow others to have a rest. i think youll see southern and mariano as 2 of your 11, 12 and 13 then ali or morro or washbrook as the other.