Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:50 am  

kinleycat wrote:

You do know that, that is a made up word, don't you?

Oh dear

Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:51 am  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

Not for a second do i believe it would end in legal action.
However it doesnt matter a jot what the operational rules say or indeed what they signed up for.
No operational rules can remove your right to a legal challenge.

Erm if you have signed away that right then yes, yes they can.

TURFEDOUT wrote:

In theory if the RFL tried to enforce and not allow Wakefield to compete in an RFL comp,Wakefield could retaliate by gaining an injuction for the competition to be suspended until the matter is resolved.

After reading this I can't decide if you are mad or delusional.

Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:52 am  

So a contract can't be challenged in court? Yore not well man.

Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:55 am  

inside man wrote:

So a contract can't be challenged in court? Yore not well man.

It could but it would be a poinless.
A judge would ask 'did you sign this?'
'Yes'
'Case dismissed'

Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:56 am  

Roverswall wrote:

Erm if you have signed away that right then yes, yes they can.

Not if the signing away of that right was deemed to be unfair; something to do with contract law and unfair terms I think, but I don't remember the details.

Anyhow - please join the queue of people who are wishing for us to fail; Castlefax are way in front of you, so wait your turn.

Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:57 am  

Roverswall wrote:

It could but it would be a poinless.
A judge would ask 'did you sign this?'
'Yes'
'Case dismissed'

But the merits of wether the RFL have the right to act in such manner and force clubs to sign, would have to be explored.

[Kosh]

Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:59 am  

TURFEDOUT wrote:

Not for a second do i believe it would end in legal action.
However it doesnt matter a jot what the operational rules say or indeed what they signed up for.
No operational rules can remove your right to a legal challenge.

The Operational Rules do not remove the right to a legal challenge. They simply state the procedure that applies in the case of a club issuing one.

TURFEDOUT wrote:

In theory if the RFL tried to enforce and not allow Wakefield to compete in an RFL comp,Wakefield could retaliate by gaining an injuction for the competition to be suspended until the matter is resolved.

On what grounds, exactly? They agreed to the terms and conditions of the Operational Rules, including suspension from competition if in legal dispute with the Governing Body. The time to challenge that condition was before agreeing to it.

Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:59 am  

Roverswall wrote:

It could but it would be a poinless.
A judge would ask 'did you sign this?'
'Yes'
'Case dismissed'

Surely it depends on whether the contract contains clauses that aren't legally binding or enforceable? I'm not saying that's necessarily the case here, though. I don't know. Just making the point.

Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:01 pm  

deeHell wrote: Will someone inform this so called journalist that we haven't shelved plans for Newmarket. http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/ru ... _1_3461744 What doesn't help is I can't find mention of Newmarket in the story on the club's website...very poorly written.

deeHell wrote: Will someone inform this so called journalist that we haven't shelved plans for Newmarket. http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/sport/ru ... _1_3461744 What doesn't help is I can't find mention of Newmarket in the story on the club's website...very poorly written.

[Kosh]

Re: NEWS FROM TONIGHT'S BIG MEETING : Thu Jun 09, 2011 12:02 pm  

kinleycat wrote:

But the merits of wether the RFL have the right to act in such manner and force clubs to sign, would have to be explored.

When did the RFL force clubs to sign? How would 'force' be demonstrated, let alone proved?

Why do people continue to fool themselves about potential legal action when no laws have been broken?