You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see
Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:45 pm
Mon Jun 10, 2019 10:52 pm
Could be because Ashurst and Batchelor picked up injuries in the Leeds game.
Tue Jun 11, 2019 6:04 am
No reason why he shouldn't score 3 trys for us if we use him correctly. It seemed a strange move in the first place. Glad to see him back
Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:52 pm
As stated pointless swap with Pauli we may have won Leeds . England and Hirst are v poor at the moment
Wed Jun 12, 2019 7:07 pm
Because we were having to play forwards in the centre.
Wed Jun 12, 2019 7:21 pm
You can never have won leeds, they are not a prize, you can however win against Leeds or beat Leeds. !!!!
Fri Jun 14, 2019 2:32 pm
Makes sense. If both players were prohibited from playing against their parent clubs as part of the loan, what is the point in having them both sitting in the stands when the point of the loan was to get match fitness.
Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:13 pm
PopTart wrote:Because we were having to play forwards in the centre.
To be fair, we played Sau on the wing which makes a nonsense of that side of the loan!
We’d have been better sticking with Kershaw and Croft with Pauli off the bench
Sat Jun 15, 2019 12:21 am
At that stage we didn't know Croft was ready.
Sat Jun 15, 2019 8:46 am
PopTart wrote:At that stage we didn't know Croft was ready.
We played him a week or so later & he’s been at the club almost 4 years so they knew where he was in terms of being ready to give him a start