: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:33 pm  

Team P W D L F A PTS
1 Leeds 3 3 0 0 65 20 6
2 Hull 2 2 0 0 46 30 4
3 Huddersfi 1 1 0 0 30 8 2
4 Salford 1 1 0 0 28 16 2
5 St Helens 1 1 0 0 26 14 2
6 Harlequin 1 1 0 0 12 8 2
7 Castleford 2 1 0 1 36 34 2
8 Catalans D 2 1 0 1 48 50 2
9 Wakefield 2 1 0 1 16 24 2
10 Bradford 1 0 1 0 13 13 1
11 Hull KR 2 0 1 1 23 32 1
12 Wigan 3 0 0 3 38 58 0
13 Warrington 2 0 0 2 34 66 0
14 Celtic Cru 3 0 0 3 42 84 0

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:38 pm  

black & white cat wrote:

Team P W D L F A PTS
1 Leeds 3 3 0 0 65 20 6
2 Hull 2 2 0 0 46 30 4
3 Huddersfi 1 1 0 0 30 8 2
4 Salford 1 1 0 0 28 16 2
5 St Helens 1 1 0 0 26 14 2
6 Harlequin 1 1 0 0 12 8 2
7 Castleford 2 1 0 1 36 34 2
8 Catalans D 2 1 0 1 48 50 2
9 Wakefield 2 1 0 1 16 24 2
10 Bradford 1 0 1 0 13 13 1
11 Hull KR 2 0 1 1 23 32 1
12 Wigan 3 0 0 3 38 58 0
13 Warrington 2 0 0 2 34 66 0
14 Celtic Cru 3 0 0 3 42 84 0

Fook thats made my weekend even better couple more drinks I think

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:39 pm  

berrigans bitch wrote:

erm ...you are not find behind that played 2 lost 2 Oh maybe you will be the same as them next week

But they did draw 1

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:43 pm  

hullbg wrote:

But they did draw 1

Oh yes


Well this Becks tastes great

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:43 pm  

denbo63 wrote:

The lemons still bitter then?????

Nope. Should have beaten Bradford and thought we played well last night. Please pay attention to the next time
We'll soon have an easy run like yours.

Oh by the way, Salford beat Celtic by more than you., and they were NL last year.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:43 pm  

black & white cat wrote:

Team P W D L F A PTS
1 Leeds 3 3 0 0 65 20 6
2 Hull 2 2 0 0 46 30 4
3 Huddersfi 1 1 0 0 30 8 2
4 Salford 1 1 0 0 28 16 2
5 St Helens 1 1 0 0 26 14 2
6 Harlequin 1 1 0 0 12 8 2
7 Castleford 2 1 0 1 36 34 2
8 Catalans D 2 1 0 1 48 50 2
9 Wakefield 2 1 0 1 16 24 2
10 Bradford 1 0 1 0 13 13 1
11 Hull KR 2 0 1 1 23 32 1
12 Wigan 3 0 0 3 38 58 0
13 Warrington 2 0 0 2 34 66 0
14 Celtic Cru 3 0 0 3 42 84 0

love it

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:47 pm  

Danny 2 wrote:

love it

Beating 2 from the bottom 3 hey! that means your not in the bottom 3! the only way is up.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:49 pm  

blakeysrobin wrote:

Beating 2 from the bottom 3 hey! that means your not in the bottom 3! the only way is up.

wigan are still a good team

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:52 pm  

Danny 2 wrote:

wigan are still a good team

Not according to your table. Produce it again and highlight them, I think you will find them EVEN below Rovers.

: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:53 pm  

blakeysrobin wrote:

Beating 2 from the bottom 3 hey! that means your not in the bottom 3! the only way is up.

But if we hadn't have beat them they wouldn't be in the 'bottom 3'

YOU WOULD!!