: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:54 pm  

A very good signing for us , Stood out during the world cup in some games.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 12:58 am  

EXILEDHULLADGATESHEAD wrote:

Please tell me you have not been wasting minutes of your life (that you can never get back) trolling through 2yrs worth of threads just to show us what a great eye for talent you have!!! My god some people need to get out more!!

Nooooooooooooo, only half an hour, fek that

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:25 am  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Yet you said he is more suited to prop? I would play him at prop were we have close to no impact at the mintue from any of our props.

He will play prop. We have an adequate back row even without Crocker. Its up front we need that grunt.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:29 am  

Big Dave T wrote:

He will play prop. We have an adequate back row even without Crocker. Its up front we need that grunt.

I have to agree, think he will replace King at prop (unless his form improves), and if Moa turns out any good, he could move to the backrow.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:32 am  

The British consulate have refused Hame's Visa.
Apparently he once laughed at an old lady who dropped her shopping....














Well..... Be typical wouldn't it?

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:36 am  

Dave K. wrote:

I have to agree, think he will replace King at prop (unless his form improves), and if Moa turns out any good, he could move to the backrow.

Why do people keep saying this about King? He has played one game in 10 months and people are talking about his form improving, what about Thacks form in the first two games, does he not need to improve also?

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:37 am  

denbo63 wrote:

The British consulate have refused Hame's Visa.
Apparently he once laughed at an old lady who dropped her shopping....














Well..... Be typical wouldn't it?

:NAUGHTY:

You do know James Scales will have this splashed all over the daily whale by lunch time now with 25+ pages on here of fans/Dobbins slagging the club off for not doing their job properly

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:39 am  

PAUL M wrote:

Why do people keep saying this about King? He has played one game in 10 months and people are talking about his form improving, what about Thacks form in the first two games, does he not need to improve also?

Thacks was far better than King against Wigan, all King did was miss tackles, lose the ball and gave penalties away. King has been consistant for three years now. Thacks at the moment offers far more than King IMO.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:39 am  

PAUL M wrote:

Why do people keep saying this about King? He has played one game in 10 months and people are talking about his form improving, what about Thacks form in the first two games, does he not need to improve also?

Guess its cos King has been on last chance for the last 4 or 5 seasons and is no where near being one of the current top 3 or 4 props at the club. brining in 2 more props can only mean one thing for him.

: Tue Feb 24, 2009 9:40 am  

PAUL M wrote:

Why do people keep saying this about King? He has played one game in 10 months and people are talking about his form improving, what about Thacks form in the first two games, does he not need to improve also?

Agreed - Some people just dont like King
We wont see him till the Derby anyway so theres a chance for both players to put themselves into a position where they cant be dropped.
can only be good news for FC