[Kosh]

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:24 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

well moa is warming up but no long

Long currently doing a piece to camera at pitch side. Still a couple of weeks away apparently.

Moa dropped according to the team being reported by the BBC.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:27 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

well moa is warming up but no long

Not playing according to text message from FC:
HULL TEAM V LEEDS: TANSEY,HALL,WHITING,YEAMAN,BRISCOE,WASHBROOK,HORNE,RADFORD,HOUGHTON,O'MELEY,MANU,TICKLE,FITZGIBBON. SUBS: LAUAKI,DOWES,CUSACK,TURNER.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:32 pm  

no moa. Confused me cos we had 19 warming up. Dowes on bench. Agar is a joke

[Kosh]

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:36 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

no moa. Confused me cos we had 19 warming up. Dowes on bench. Agar is a joke

And you need a better source.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 1:45 pm  

Did any of us really, with genuine conviction, believe it would be any different?

I'll go out on a limb and say before the game that unless it's an injury or disciplinary issue, it's the wrong call, regardless of the result. Again it just sends the message out that playing performance is not how you earn a place in Agar's team.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:15 pm  

This Sam Moa would have to be some player to have made a difference today

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:18 pm  

WHY OH WHY DOES HE NOT GET SELECTED ,IT AMAZES ME

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:28 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

This Sam Moa would have to be some player to have made a difference today

In purely playing terms, no, he couldn't possibly have made enough difference.

BUT, in terms of the team's attitude and approach, is his dropping indicative of one of the multitude of problems we have (i.e. palyers not playing for their places)? And if so, how far up the list of problems is this general point?

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:34 pm  

carl_spackler wrote:

In purely playing terms, no, he couldn't possibly have made enough difference.

BUT, in terms of the team's attitude and approach, is his dropping indicative of one of the multitude of problems we have (i.e. palyers not playing for their places)? And if so, how far up the list of problems is this general point?

I think Agar has his prop choices right though i would start with Dowes and Cusack.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:36 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

I think Agar has his prop choices right though i would start with Dowes and Cusack.

are you drunk today?