Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:46 am  

Ah... My bad ;-s

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:42 am  

the cal train wrote:

if we were to get Elima, Whitehead, and Bateman, Tickle must be going, how can we have that many backrowers? Or Tickle into front row?
I think having Bateman, Whitehead, Elima, Kent, Pitts, Westerman, Ellis, Tickle and Aspinwall(staying?) is too many first team backrowers
FWIW I don't think we'd sign those three anyways, maybe one of them.

Pitts was brought in to at in the front row, although I can't see him playing there unless he does some massive bulking up. Aspinwall can also play in the front row, and plays well there. Same for Elima playing prop is not a problem for him.

[Kosh]

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:51 am  

World of Redboy wrote:

The Bulls, once they entered administration should have booted straight in to NL2 by default, regardless of whether they found a buyer.

Under which rule?

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:13 pm  

World of Redboy wrote:

The Bulls, once they entered administration should have booted straight in to NL2 by default, regardless of whether they found a buyer.

Ridiculous comment. Points deduction is set in stone, not just in SL but other sports i.e football as well.

Bulls entered administration through mis-management by the previous owners and they have had their punishment in the form of 6 points deducted.

What I don't agree with is the support that they have been given by the RFL / Sky to stay afloat until a new buyer was eventually found. They should have been forced into selling some of their assets (players) instead of being provided with handouts, this unfair advantage means that Wakey / HKR may miss out on a play off spot, which Bradford should not be in a position to be challanging for (unless they could have done it after selling several star players)

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 2:45 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Under which rule?

Any club entering administration should have their license revoked.

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 2:47 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

Any club entering administration should have their license revoked.

that's not a rule, that's an opinion - and also something which is not practised in even mainstream sports

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 2:50 pm  

OmneFC wrote:

that's not a rule, that's an opinion - and also something which is not practised in even mainstream sports

I never said it was, thanks.

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 2:54 pm  

OmneFC wrote:

that's not a rule, that's an opinion - and also something which is not practised in even mainstream sports

A ridiculous opinion at that.

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 2:55 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

I never said it was, thanks.

you said it in reply to Kosh asking "under which rule?"

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:03 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Under which rule?

james