Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:38 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

I think Agar has his prop choices right though i would start with Dowes and Cusack.

I disagree. I think there's only room in the 17 for 2 from Dowes/Cusack/Radford. When there are 2 of them on the pitch at the same time we are noticeably weaker attacking the line.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:43 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

are you drunk today?

Not at all.

In terms of technique they are the best two props Hull have imho.

BTW did O'Meley play today???

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:48 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

I think Agar has his prop choices right though i would start with Dowes and Cusack.

DRUNK OR MENTALLY CHALLENGED

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:54 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

Not at all.

In terms of technique they are the best two props Hull have imho.

BTW did O'Meley play today???

technique?

They showed it today!

Moa should have played in front of dowes, radford and cusack

[Kosh]

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 3:56 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

Not at all.

In terms of technique they are the best two props Hull have imho.

That's probably true, but both are in woeful form at the moment and Moa should have been ahead of both them and Radford if we are playing people on form as stated at the beginning of the season.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:00 pm  

Kosh wrote:

That's probably true, but both are in woeful form at the moment and Moa should have been ahead of both them and Radford if we are playing people on form as stated at the beginning of the season.

Has Agar ever dropped Radford? Not sure TBH. I think that Agar's "senior leadership group" or whatever he calls it includes Radders, Dowes and Cusack.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:03 pm  

Kosh wrote:

That's probably true, but both are in woeful form at the moment and Moa should have been ahead of both them and Radford if we are playing people on form as stated at the beginning of the season.

Probably because they have been coming from the bench, something their styles are not suited to.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:05 pm  

Without trailing through the whole thread, seems a very strange decision to leave him out. Thought he made some good impact last week, albeit in his limited minutes on the pitch.

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:08 pm  

If i was Sam i'd rip up my contract. What a waste of time it has been signing him. Clearly Agar has his favourates and will only pick players like Sam if and only if there are injuries.

Sorry Sam but you should have gone elsewhere

Re: Big Sam : Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:10 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

Probably because they have been coming from the bench, something their styles are not suited to.

O'Meley starts that's a vive, Moa from the bench then fit in the next two props who can play in the roles.

Dowes has been awful!