Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:13 pm  

007 wrote:

Not according to the Referee AND Touch judge.

they got it wrong i clearly saw it as did everyone around me!!!

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:16 pm  

Towns88 wrote:

Im guessing, because we gained no advantage (ended up in touch) from your knock on.

What he gave you a scrum for when it looked like either we'd ripped it or you'd knocked it on, well I don't know.

Child out.

Getting 10 metres over the advantage line is more than enough

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:17 pm  

Towns88 wrote:

Im guessing, because we gained no advantage (ended up in touch) from your knock on.

What he gave you a scrum for when it looked like either we'd ripped it or you'd knocked it on, well I don't know.

Child out.

Any advantage was well and truely over by then.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:18 pm  

Robbo4 wrote:

The second one was when we off-loaded in the tackle and he stopped the game and gave us a scrum.

Baffling.

Look at The Laws of the Game then.

If the ball comes loose, as the ref calls "held", a scrum is formed with head and ball to the team last in possession.

As I said earlier, a major problem we have in the game is speccies being clueless.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:20 pm  

tommyfromhull wrote:

Players' reactions on Twitter (JTP, hope you enjoy ) :

EwanDowes Ewan Dowes
I've never seen anything like that in my entire life #pantspulleddown

samobst sam obst
Ridiculous

Stilts84 Rich Whiting
@samobst glad my head won't allow me to remember any of it!!

Washy85 Danny Washbrook
Had lots of tweets acknowledging the boys effort 2nite, thanks. Oh and 1 idiot.

Anything on Rich & Kath's twitter?

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:23 pm  

what I have noticed this season so far is that it's become faster at the play the ball , therefore the whole game's pace has become faster. We need to have video ref's at all games and seriously look at the 2 ref system here.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:23 pm  

I must confess, as Cas fan I even thought some of the decisions were terrible, and even though it won't be much consolation I do think you got some rough calls. Really not sure what Radford did wrong to get ten minutes, surely a head high 15 mins into the game doesn't warrant ten mins in the bin, when we admittedly went high twice and stayed on the pitch- inconsistency or what...

I know Rich Agar will probably feel it in his wallet but I think that he has said what every other Super League coach has been thinking- hopefully this will get them to have a closer look at what he is doing, because he is clearly ruining potentially good games of RL. He's struck twice for Cas this year already.

Still, I thought Cas showed grit and determination to stick it out and I'm pleased with the result, but I'm sure you guys will pick up results as the year goes on. All the best for the rest of the year.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:24 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

Look at The Laws of the Game then.

If the ball comes loose, as the ref calls "held", a scrum is formed with head and ball to the team last in possession.

As I said earlier, a major problem we have in the game is speccies being clueless.

The ball didn't "come loose" the player was in the act of being tackled and he off-loaded the ball to his own player. If he was held then its penalty to Cas, if he wasn't held then its play on. Why comment on something you haven't even seen? Clueless indeed.

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:27 pm  

The Doctor wrote:

I must confess, as Cas fan I even thought some of the decisions were terrible, and even though it won't be much consolation I do think you got some rough calls. Really not sure what Radford did wrong to get ten minutes, surely a head high 15 mins into the game doesn't warrant ten mins in the bin, when we admittedly went high twice and stayed on the pitch- inconsistency or what...

I know Rich Agar will probably feel it in his wallet but I think that he has said what every other Super League coach has been thinking- hopefully this will get them to have a closer look at what he is doing, because he is clearly ruining potentially good games of RL. He's struck twice for Cas this year already.

Still, I thought Cas showed grit and determination to stick it out and I'm pleased with the result, but I'm sure you guys will pick up results as the year goes on. All the best for the rest of the year.

Radford said (on Humberside) it was for a choke hold, although he also said something along the lines of "if I wanted to put a choke hold on someone I'd back myself to do it properly" He also said that Brett Ferres (IIRC) did the same thing a few minuites later and it was let go. (or possibly a penalty).

Re: Childs : Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:29 pm  

Robbo4 wrote:

The ball didn't "come loose" the player was in the act of being tackled and he off-loaded the ball to his own player. If he was held then its penalty to Cas, if he wasn't held then its play on. Why comment on something you haven't even seen? Clueless indeed.

The referee decides on whether he is held or not, thankfully that's not down to some clueless speccie.

I don't need to see the incident, all I need to do is quote what The Laws of the Game state.

Something you really are clueless about.

You don't even have to spend any money to get a copy, they are available on-line. All you need is the ability to read and comprehend.