Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:08 pm  

OmneFC wrote:

you said it in reply to Kosh asking "under which rule?"

Sorry, I should have explained it better.

IMO, any club entering administration should have their license revoked.

Bradford knew what was coming and they should have cut their cloth accordingly, they didn't. They overspent to try and compete, then they've been held up by the governing body until new owners are found and nobody (potentially) faces any punishment for it, except their creditors.
Why should people like Pearson & Hudgell underwrite debts while they try to make their clubs sustainable when they see this going on?

I'd hoped they'd survive and it appears they have, but I don't see why they should keep their license when financial prudence is an important factor in the whole system.

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:10 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

Sorry, I should have explained it better.

IMO, any club entering administration should have their license revoked.

Bradford knew what was coming and they should have cut their cloth accordingly, they didn't. They overspent to try and compete, then they've been held up by the governing body until new owners are found and nobody (potentially) faces any punishment for it, except their creditors.
Why should people like Pearson & Hudgell underwrite debts while they try to make their clubs sustainable when they see this going on?

I'd hoped they'd survive and it appears they have, but I don't see why they should keep their license when financial prudence is an important factor in the whole system.

Even after it's been explained, it's still a ridiculous opinion.

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:17 pm  

Barnabus wrote:

Even after it's been explained, it's still a ridiculous opinion.

Is that your argument against?

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:20 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

Sorry, I should have explained it better.

IMO, any club entering administration should have their license revoked.

Bradford knew what was coming and they should have cut their cloth accordingly, they didn't. They overspent to try and compete, then they've been held up by the governing body until new owners are found and nobody (potentially) faces any punishment for it, except their creditors.
Why should people like Pearson & Hudgell underwrite debts while they try to make their clubs sustainable when they see this going on?

I'd hoped they'd survive and it appears they have, but I don't see why they should keep their license when financial prudence is an important factor in the whole system.

Completely agree

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:25 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

Is that your argument against?

No.

It's such a poor and ignorant 'argument' that, quite frankly, isn't worthly of debate.

Ridiculous.

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:26 pm  

bradford should have to give us bateman and whitehead to punish them

[R.B.A]

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:51 pm  

Was told earlier that Hull have made a move for Sammut from Bradford.

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:56 pm  

Barnabus wrote:

No.

It's such a poor and ignorant 'argument' that, quite frankly, isn't worthly of debate.

Ridiculous.

Ah right, so you have no argument then? That's fine, I wasn't expecting you to be capable.

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 3:56 pm  

R.B.A wrote:

Was told earlier that Hull have made a move for Sammut from Bradford.

Sounds about right.

Re: Rumours.... : Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:08 pm  

R.B.A wrote:

Was told earlier that Hull have made a move for Sammut from Bradford.

So to recap, your predictions are Tom Briscoe to Leeds and Jarrod Sammut to Hull FC?