Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sat May 17, 2014 11:31 pm  

knocker norton wrote:

Cheers pal I needed cheering up

Denial? Please expain.

Well in a nutshell you are rubbish and have an owner who thinks he knows better than experienced rugby league people.

Obviously your serial failure goes deeper than that but we could write a book couldn't we?

You the fans are the main problem IMO.

Under whatever ownership be it Lloyd, Hetherington or Pearson you start out believing every word that these out of town upstarts sell to you.

From an owners point of view there is no benefit in actually being any good because you lot will buy into any old bull they spin anyway.

All of your recent owners are opportunists who do not have Hull FC in their blood.

As I say we could all write a book but you asked me to explain about your denial and hopefully I have given you a clue.

[Kosh]

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sat May 17, 2014 11:33 pm  

Please don't engage with His Babness. The guy has a reputation as one of the most clueless posters on the whole site, so you're just wasting your time and encouraging the poor deluded fool.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sat May 17, 2014 11:49 pm  

I think his babness's summary is pretty bang on tbh

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 6:11 am  

Sebasteeno wrote:

I think his babness's summary is pretty bang on tbh

You've just proved Kosh's point.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 7:07 am  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Top 4 reffing. Simple as that.

Wonder if we'll get some 'top 4' disciplinary panel decisions for Wigan

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 8:27 am  

Ellis smashing Larroyer when the game was over was about my highlight of the game I'm sad to say.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 9:08 am  

Cockayne's trip is no longer a mandatory sending off as it is not deemed dangerous play, but I think he would have had a yellow card had the try not been scored.

As for Crookes, IMO never a red card but a yellow at worst, if it had have been one of the usual top 4 clubs it would have been on report and a penalty, Mciloram has form for violent behaviour and if he had a black and white or red and white shirt on he would spend more time at Red Hall than on the pitch, all this does is prove Pearson and Hudge were right.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 10:12 am  

Anyone else recieved a pm from Radfords chief cheerleader?.Resorts to insulting anyone who has a different opinion

Pathetic

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 10:13 am  

phil webbo wrote:

Cockayne's trip is no longer a mandatory sending off as it is not deemed dangerous play, but I think he would have had a yellow card had the try not been scored.

As for Crookes, IMO never a red card but a yellow at worst, if it had have been one of the usual top 4 clubs it would have been on report and a penalty, Mciloram has form for violent behaviour and if he had a black and white or red and white shirt on he would spend more time at Red Hall than on the pitch, all this does is prove Pearson and Hudge were right.

Sorry. Red card all the way. Maybe right about Charlie though.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 10:16 am  

Highlight was Yeamo dropping the fat turd after he passed.not a highlight was Hodgesons celebration at end.....very classy