Re: V St.Helens CC Risk players or take the loss? : Fri Jun 01, 2018 4:07 pm
Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:
You don't know how fit either of them are though. They might be ahead of schedule, but if they pass whatever tests are required then they are good to go. Beating the initial prognosis by a couple weeks isn't necessarily rushing them back. If they are ready they are ready.
I disagree that in reality we won't beat Saints. We are outsiders for the game, but we absolutely can beat them. It would hardly be the upset of the year. There are only 3 trophies to play for, and one is as good as gone already. So even if we only have a slim chance we have to do whatever we can to take it.
I disagree that in reality we won't beat Saints. We are outsiders for the game, but we absolutely can beat them. It would hardly be the upset of the year. There are only 3 trophies to play for, and one is as good as gone already. So even if we only have a slim chance we have to do whatever we can to take it.
Ok we will disagree about the result but going by Radfords pre game interview he is basing the team selection on risk and reward which i think is the wrong option.
yes it will be disappointing to go out of the C/C but our priority is surely to try and get to the Grand final and its easier if we make the top four.
Again according to Radford Kelly is four weeks ahead of schedule and as someone else pointed out Carlos was supposed to be out for 12 weeks.
He also said that if a player puts his hand up to play he trusts them to know if they are fit to play which really should be the decision of the physio team.
Personal opinion but i would rather both players stay under treatment until they are deemed 100% fit by the Physio and not pushed to play.
It looks like Westerman will be out as his injury has not responded to treatment and he has gone for a scan today.