Re: Big Sam : Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:00 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

I would drop Dowes, he looked out of sorts on Sunday.

Has Dowes ever been "In sorts"?

Re: Big Sam : Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:06 pm  

I'm at a loss for what Dowes offers. Poor super league prop.

Re: Big Sam : Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:13 pm  

nosneb wrote:

agar won,t have the balls to play moa

well was right about that one , not saying would of made the outcome different, as too many need to look at themselves in the mirror . but when people say he is playing well and was outstanding at leeds as most said he was, then im sorry you must question agar for picking

Re: Big Sam : Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:15 pm  

nosneb wrote:

well was right about that one , not saying would of made the outcome different, as too many need to look at themselves in the mirror . but when people say he is playing well and was outstanding at leeds as most said he was, then im sorry you must question agar for picking

sorry not picking

Re: Big Sam : Mon Apr 19, 2010 6:06 am  

I have seen loads of fans mention un droppable players, but its usually the teams best players who are given more chances when they are out of sorts or big name players who were signed and not quite lived up to the hype but with a history of quality, it sums Agar up perfectly that his un droppables are Radford, Dowes and Cussack, tells you everything you need to know about his attitude towards the game.

Re: Big Sam : Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:06 am  

fcandy wrote:

Has Dowes ever been "In sorts"?

I like Dowes, gets through lots of work but in the last couple of season he has not performed as well as he can. He merely lumbers the ball up without ever threatening to break a tackle or offload the ball.

Would pick Moa everytime ahead of him at present.

Re: Big Sam : Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:08 am  

If I were to run onto the middle of the pitch after 20mins and fart, I would have far more impact than Dowes and Cusack put together !!!

That pretty much sums up our bench for me.

PATHETIC !